BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Make place 3-5 more attractive

Make place 3-5 more attractive

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
156862.77 in reply to 156862.76
Date: 9/24/2010 10:43:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Every team can set default lineup. There is no way for accidental walkover if he set it.


could but must not ;) And let give us a sitution liek hattrick before some weeks, the server crashed for two days, and many teams have forgotten their cup lineup even when there is a standard lineup too.

This Post:
00
156862.78 in reply to 156862.76
Date: 9/24/2010 10:45:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
Actually that isn't quite correct. For example, the last time I set my "standard" lineup was weeks ago. However since then there have been multiple changes to my roster. So if a team hasn't set a default lineup recently and they have had roster changes then it is quite easy for them to not set a lineup and have a walkover.

This Post:
00
156862.79 in reply to 156862.78
Date: 9/24/2010 10:49:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
272272
but you should change 8 players at minimum to your lineup, to cause default lineup to be less than 3 players. so if you're doing such a major change, please be kind and keep in mind to set default lineup when you're finished. this would be a stupid excuse "i sold and bought players, so i didn't set default lineup"...

From: Rycka
This Post:
00
156862.80 in reply to 156862.79
Date: 9/24/2010 10:55:32 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
272272
on topic. if you still feel that this needs to be fixed, even if it isn't broken, how about just giving one relegation game for 6th and 7th place instead of a series until 2 wins?

This Post:
00
156862.81 in reply to 156862.80
Date: 9/24/2010 11:51:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
on topic. if you still feel that this needs to be fixed, even if it isn't broken, how about just giving one relegation game for 6th and 7th place instead of a series until 2 wins?


I think that makes it way too harsh for 6th and 7th. Too many people will be unluckily relegating.

Simply having no salary to pay during the offseason would solve all these problems.

This Post:
00
156862.82 in reply to 156862.81
Date: 9/24/2010 11:58:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
272272
Simply having no salary to pay during the offseason would solve all these problems.


woudn't it be more of a bonus for finishing 5th not 4th? 4th place if they lost first po game would be in disadvantage, wouldn't it?

unless you mean that all 8 teams would have no salary to pay in offseason. but would it be logical? all season you have to pay, and when its time for most important matches, your players are playing for free.

Last edited by Rycka at 9/24/2010 12:00:05 PM

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
156862.83 in reply to 156862.82
Date: 9/24/2010 12:03:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
unless you mean that all 8 teams would have no salary to pay in offseason. but would it be logical? all season you have to pay, and when its time for most important matches, your players are playing for free.


and it wouldn't change anything, but probadly he mean that you don't pay salary when you are finished with your regular games.

From: Rycka

This Post:
00
156862.84 in reply to 156862.83
Date: 9/24/2010 12:08:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
272272
and it wouldn't change anything, but probadly he mean that you don't pay salary when you are finished with your regular games.


what do you consider "regular" games. if a team is in finals, so the other teams which are not do not pay salary's? what advantage you get instead of promotion then?

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
156862.85 in reply to 156862.84
Date: 9/24/2010 12:19:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
and it wouldn't change anything, but probadly he mean that you don't pay salary when you are finished with your regular games.


what do you consider "regular" games. if a team is in finals, so the other teams which are not do not pay salary's? what advantage you get instead of promotion then?


extra mins for training, a better fan survey for next season and the Chanche for promotion and it shouldn't be an instant handicap.

From: Rycka

This Post:
00
156862.86 in reply to 156862.85
Date: 9/24/2010 12:22:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
272272
extra mins for training


does it really pays off considering you dont have to pay 500k salarys? (1st league).

a better fan survey for next season


this allready is implemented, but people think it's worthless.

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
156862.87 in reply to 156862.86
Date: 9/24/2010 1:11:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
does it really pays off considering you dont have to pay 500k salarys? (1st league).


for many leagues it pays of, but don't forget you still have income to pay your salary. So also a little bonus is a bonus.

this allready is implemented, but people think it's worthless.


i think the people consider it as not big enough, or to bad to catch - but it is still a bit extra money.

In the end, the actual cost should be pretty neutral, so if you don't play the playoff you probadly have a comparable amount of money in the end then someone is playing the PO or relegation - but you have still a bunce of advantages and hopefully the ambition to play succesful(and not to play unsuccesful to get an instant advantage)

Advertisement