he's always sure to be right
Always ready to read well nuanced arguments, with stats or examples or anything objective, to support them. You want to make a case for Ronaldo? Be my guest. However as evidenced in this thread, there is one fundamental problem with this approach if you are a Ronaldo supporter: Ronaldo is undoubtedly great, but Messi has won more both individually and team-wise.
Have you seen me debating with those who like Ronaldo more and say they would pick him ahead of Messi? Nope. You like one better, I like another better, that's ok, no problem with that. It's the people who state stuff out of their asses as if it's a divine truth, without backing it up in any way or using partial information. Edit: There is also people who use straw man arguments trying to discredit an alternative point of view...
Take you for example: did you explain how it's possible that someone changes direction and moves towards, moves his arm, hits the ball with his arm, but did so involuntarily? No, of course you didn't. Maybe you think his arm didn't hit the ball, did you explain how a shot directed to the goal hitting the chest or a shoulder of a defender can physically change direction vertically towards the ground if it didn't hit the arm? No, of course you didn't.
Oh don't worry for him, he's not embarrassing himself.
Oh I worry, I worry for everyone. He bashed someone for not knowing the rules. I posted the rules and I pointed out how it's very hard to claim that was a passive offside. Even Ronaldo knew this and actually tried to convince the referee he didn't do anything while he was offside, knowing that Atkinson might have tried to equalise the mistake in the second half.
However this is embarrassing because even if you think he was not offside, you cannot bash someone else for not knowing the rules when, if you knew the rules yourself, you'd realise that this was a completely subjective decision by the referee.
Look, we get it, you fellas can't explain how a ball travelling horizontally suddenly goes to the ground, can't explain how being between 2 defenders, moving towards the ball and jumping for it is not playing the ball. The UK press has no beef with either Ronaldo, Messi, Barcelona or Real Madrid and they all saw the episodes the same way.
All I've done in this thread is debunking the fundamentally false assertion that Ronaldo has scored more than Messi, that Ronaldo has won more than Messi, that Ronaldo scored 2 valid goals against Bayern and that Carvajal did not hit the ball with his hand voluntarily.
Also a suggestion to the guys from the balkans: if you want to use a game as proof of Ronaldo greatness, using as an example a game where he opened up the match with a goal which was controversial worldwide is probably not the best way. It's like using Maradona's hand goal to point out his greatness. It's just dumb, especially considering the second goal Maradona scored in that game or better games Ronaldo had this season without controversial goals...
Last edited by Lemonshine at 5/3/2017 1:36:29 PM