BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Canada > [NT] Team Update

[NT] Team Update

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
30905.78 in reply to 30905.77
Date: 8/4/2008 9:41:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
That is a good question, indeed.

By the way, I think Uruguay did wrong to CT us, that's what did them in.


Do you think Uruguay did wrong? It seems that they were screwed no matter what they did.

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
30905.79 in reply to 30905.78
Date: 8/4/2008 10:47:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
No... if they lost vs us, with TIE, would get a little better enthusiasm, then take Peru and beat them. Peru would have finished 1 victory behind us and Uruguay would play semifinals.

To be honest i'm not too happy how this group went. I expected we finish 2nd (which we did) behind Brazil (which was eliminated).
This happened because of countless of CT games from some teams, which caused that everyone in here finishes with horrible enthusiasm, including the two that qualified.

I tried building the enthusiasm, and if we didn't lose the previous game we could have had a better chance in next game. By losing vs a CT we had to win today, and win big. Which we did, but don't ask about enthusiasm drop.

That's where we stand

This Post:
00
30905.80 in reply to 30905.79
Date: 8/5/2008 1:01:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Good luck next week - it should be a good game and I wish you all the best.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
30905.81 in reply to 30905.80
Date: 8/5/2008 1:52:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Thanks, we need all the luck we can get...

Even with luck, I think you have the final in the bag, but we will try..

This Post:
00
30905.82 in reply to 30905.81
Date: 8/5/2008 2:24:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
No no no, bad attitude.

You can't win if you don't believe you can win.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
30905.83 in reply to 30905.82
Date: 8/5/2008 9:16:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
well, we will do the best we can, rest assured

This Post:
00
30905.84 in reply to 30905.83
Date: 8/7/2008 8:48:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3737
It's getting to be the time of the season where players who were not good choices for the roster at the start of the season have surpassed existing members. A semi-final game might be a good time to spring some surprises.

So, what's the state of the non-roster bubble players I assume you're tracking? Is anyone ready to make the leap?

This Post:
00
30905.85 in reply to 30905.84
Date: 8/7/2008 2:56:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Yes, there are 3 players (only) that I take in consideration and none of their owners answered lately to my questions about evolution

If nothing comes soon, I might bring them to team to see the stats, but I try not to for now.

This Post:
00
30905.86 in reply to 30905.85
Date: 8/7/2008 8:26:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
Can we get a better SF? I know that you want a guy who can shoot from the outside. However, if you look at our losses, the SF from the other team killed us on offense. Is it just that we don't have any quality SFs in Canada?

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
30905.87 in reply to 30905.86
Date: 8/8/2008 12:44:30 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
I dont think the lacking of SF's is only a Canadian problem. It is a BB problem because it is hard to train SF's, because they have no one position training, which would help them.

This Post:
00
30905.88 in reply to 30905.86
Date: 8/8/2008 1:19:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
It's a little complicated.
In the formations we used, the SF's can't do much even if they are good.

I can't go in too many details, I can go after we are officially out.

Last edited by uflorin at 8/8/2008 1:20:52 AM

Advertisement