BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Minor suggestion 2

Minor suggestion 2 (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Peja

This Post:
00
202503.786 in reply to 202503.785
Date: 5/30/2014 6:20:51 AM
Los GansoS
DBA Pro A
Overall Posts Rated:
101101
Second Team:
Los GansoS II
Cant go around the facts, i just hoped it is possible

Last edited by Peja at 5/30/2014 6:21:11 AM

This Post:
00
202503.787 in reply to 202503.786
Date: 5/30/2014 9:23:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
329329
Supporters should be able to name recently drafted players. And if you think it would be used for profanities, well, we kind of already have that in the game. (25011)

This Post:
00
202503.789 in reply to 202503.788
Date: 5/30/2014 8:49:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
323323
I have an easy way to explain that, how many players would there be named Lebron and Durant.
I bet every draftee someone gets who cares more about pro will be ridiculous.
For example.

4 years worth of draft picks:

Lebron James
Kevin Durant
Dwayne Wade
Chris Bosh
Kobe Bryant.
Rajon Rondo
Kevin Garnett
Blake Griffin
Kevin Love
Wilt Chamberlain
Magic Johnson
Bill Rusell

This Post:
00
202503.791 in reply to 202503.788
Date: 6/5/2014 11:56:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
129129
Anti-Tanking Measures:

1) Draft Lottery for the top 6 picks where each team has equal weight to get the top pick possibly.
2) 4 teams that relegate pay the 1 team that advances the cash for advancing.
3) Raise the Salary Floor:
Division I: 220% of TV money
Division II: 180% of TV money
Keep the lower divisions the same as its not as easy to accumulate a fortune there.

This Post:
11
202503.794 in reply to 202503.791
Date: 6/6/2014 8:01:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
Anti-Tanking Measures:
2) 4 teams that relegate pay the 1 team that advances the cash for advancing.


So a team that tanks all season, but does just enough to finish seventh and then buys ringers for a couple of weeks to win a relegation series is not hurt in the least, while a competitive team that they knock out is given the double whammy. Not good.

If you want to punish tanking, you need to punish teams that put out weak lineups for league games. If you lose a game with a lineup that's dramatically below league standards, your attendance and merchandise should take a serious hit for several weeks - why should the fans pay good money to go see a game if they're worried you're going to play a bunch of scrubs and lose by 80?

The solution to people not trying because it's profitable is to make it unprofitable to not try.

From: Marko
This Post:
00
202503.795 in reply to 202503.794
Date: 6/7/2014 8:23:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
129129
Add BBB and NT matches to the attendance history page. Just a nice small visual improvement.

This Post:
00
202503.796 in reply to 202503.794
Date: 6/7/2014 11:58:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
129129

If you want to punish tanking, you need to punish teams that put out weak lineups for league games. If you lose a game with a lineup that's dramatically below league standards, your attendance and merchandise should take a serious hit for several weeks - why should the fans pay good money to go see a game if they're worried you're going to play a bunch of scrubs and lose by 80?

The solution to people not trying because it's profitable is to make it unprofitable to not try.


I understand where you are coming from on this. However, I do have an issue to raise. With cup games it becomes a challenge to manage gameshape. Unless you carry a team 12 man deep that can all play. If you have three tough games and can manage to win two of three, why try on all three when you know the third is futile? It's likely to mess up game shape.

But if you are losing every game because you have no team to muster that is different. Either raise the amount needed to (IE Player Salary Floor) or make the income less from attendence for losing teams. I believe both cases are done. However, it clearly is not strong enough yet.

Last edited by lawrenman at 6/7/2014 11:59:00 PM

Advertisement