BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Game engine

Game engine

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
155698.8 in reply to 155698.7
Date: 9/1/2010 12:22:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
Anyway to cut the story short, what made me write this post isnt the fact that I lost. I am ok with that. He was playing in his own court, the teams are fairly equal or close to equal. What I didnt like was the sudden scoreline in the 4rth quarter. In the first 4 minutes oif the courter he was wining 20-3 if Iam not mistaken. Then 25-5. And fisnished with 33-10.


That's part of basketball, teams get hot and make runs with momentum changing back and forth.

Even his PG with value of about 6,000 against my PG of about 30,000 salary.


His PG only shot 3-10, which seems inline with his 77ppg matchup rating. Salary is not always a good indicator of performance, you're leaving out the important skills that drive those salaries, enthusiasm, etc.

I am asking so as to learn cause to be honest I was very upset after the end of the game cause it didnt seem right to me.


It will be hard for you to improve your team with this viewpoint. From a neutral point of view, this game seems to have played out fairly. Maybe it could have been a little closer, but it was within 10 points until the last couple mins.

Maybe your players dont have great stamina, have skills that need to be trained up to be more rounded, the tactics weren't the best (he attacked your weaker outside defense with the RNG, successfully), maybe you need to work on other aspects like managing enthusiasm better, etc. I'm just brainstorming here, but these are probably better things to focus on then second guessing the GE, at least in this case.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
From: SKill

This Post:
00
155698.9 in reply to 155698.8
Date: 9/1/2010 1:06:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
322322
I'm just brainstorming here, but these are probably better things to focus on then second guessing the GE, at least in this case.

Its easier and might don't take that much time.

This Post:
00
155698.10 in reply to 155698.5
Date: 9/1/2010 9:38:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
I included the college scores because there are 5 divisions in BB and only the best of the best could be considered NBA-ish. D.1's of Spain, Italy, USA, Germany are the NBA. The rest of us are lucky to be even NCAA level. Thai d.1 is more like NAIA women's hoops.

Anyway, you also have to consider the fact that there are more games played in one season of BB than have ever been played in the NBA. It stands to reason that there will be more examples of weird outcomes.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
155698.11 in reply to 155698.10
Date: 9/1/2010 9:40:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
Thai d.1 is more like NAIA women's hoops.


Yikes..that where you scored the basket that made you laugh?

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
44
155698.12 in reply to 155698.11
Date: 9/1/2010 9:49:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
No. That was from the balcony of my parent's bedroom over a pine tree nothing but net when I was about 14.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
11
155698.13 in reply to 155698.11
Date: 9/2/2010 11:12:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2929
Anyway guys thanks for your time.

This Post:
00
155698.15 in reply to 155698.14
Date: 9/7/2010 1:58:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6161
Insteed of creating a new post i decided to expose some of my doubts about the game engine:

1. If i have a PG and SG and a SF with lots of driving and passing, does this mean that they will be always penetrating and trying to make good passes in order to disrupt my opponents defense?

2. if i have my PF and C with good passing will they recieve the balls inside the paint, and try to pass it to an outside shooter?

3. if my forwards have good driving, does this mean that they have good post moves and they will aply them agains defenders?


Thanks, Obrigado

Radmanovic


Last edited by Radmanovic at 9/7/2010 2:08:13 PM

This Post:
00
155698.16 in reply to 155698.15
Date: 9/8/2010 7:54:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
272272
2. if i have my PF and C with good passing will they recieve the balls inside the paint, and try to pass it to an outside shooter?


i think so. i do notice the c or pf passes to guards which takes shots at the top of the key often in my games.

3. if my forwards have good driving, does this mean that they have good post moves and they will aply them agains defenders?


don't think so. i haven't notice any difference between my awful and atrociuos drivers. both of them are c's and have similar skills, and the one with atrociuos driving is doing better (his skills are sligthly better, except driving).

This Post:
00
155698.17 in reply to 155698.16
Date: 9/8/2010 9:09:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
6161
3. if my forwards have good driving, does this mean that they have good post moves and they will aply them agains defenders?



don't think so. i haven't notice any difference between my awful and atrociuos drivers. both of them are c's and have similar skills, and the one with atrociuos driving is doing better (his skills are sligthly better, except driving).


In Ball inside i noticed that even if your Center has better driving and same ofensive Skills as your PF, you PF will shoot more and better. For example my PF that is actualy injured shoots 56% (22 shots per game) with only 13 I.S. and 9 Shot. Its strange because he always puts up big numbers. And my other players have lower numbers (very lower) now he is injured, my Center wins almos 1/2 of my teams rebounds, and my SG (that in other games was shooting 35%) is now shooting 50% 19.5 Points per game, its funny to see how the game adapts to your players.

This Post:
00
155698.18 in reply to 155698.17
Date: 9/8/2010 10:50:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
272272
In Ball inside i noticed that even if your Center has better driving and same ofensive Skills as your PF, you PF will shoot more and better.


that's not true in my case. i usually play Paykin at C and Ercius at PF. Paykin averages in scoring more. this week i started Paykin at PF and he's been outstanding there too. 26 and 23 points at two games. Paykin has atrociuos driving, while Ercius has awful. their inside shot is at equal level and Paykin has +1 jumpshot. maybe this JS gives him an advantage at offense over Ercius. i should consider starting Paykin at pf at all times though. just switch the defense to C :) hes better defender at C and Ercius better at pf, so that's why i played them like that until now :)

Last edited by Rycka at 9/8/2010 10:52:06 AM

Advertisement