BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Enthusiasm or Home Court Advantage?

Enthusiasm or Home Court Advantage?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
215011.8 in reply to 215011.7
Date: 4/28/2012 2:40:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i am pretty sure you played strictly follow instead of coach decide, cause in this case he makes silly decisions

This Post:
00
215011.9 in reply to 215011.8
Date: 4/29/2012 3:42:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
Damn...you know what? I did. I made that mistake. The minutes are all over the place now

I'll try to test this tactic more in PL games. But as some others already said, if "blank lineup" is the best setting for a game, then why are we still playing? We can't outsmart a computer?

This Post:
00
215011.10 in reply to 215011.9
Date: 4/29/2012 4:18:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i said it in the B3 thread, it depends also on your team. LCD with Blank lineup isn't superior, for everyone in every situation. I like it, but you don't need to use it and the coach have some weird priorities which makes you vulnerable in some way.

A big plus for destroying an opponent, for a team with a gap betwen first and second string is that the blowout rules aren't followed so that i recommend it here.

This Post:
00
215011.11 in reply to 215011.9
Date: 4/30/2012 8:33:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
216216
My feeling is that LCD with a blank lineup will not let you play to the opponent's weaknesses. The GE only looks at your players and fits them in so as to maximize your own metric. When I did it, it put my $140k C at SF, which may or may not be right.

This Post:
00
215011.13 in reply to 215011.10
Date: 5/7/2012 2:31:54 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
Sadly, I didn't make it: (45815153). I would probably pull a win if I played M2M defense. HCA played a huge factor. I didn't get outrebounded in a single league game this season while playing 3-2 in every game. At least I learned something from it

This Post:
00
215011.14 in reply to 215011.13
Date: 5/7/2012 3:09:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
3-2 isn't a good choiche against, inside attacks especially when you don't want to hide an bad isnide defensiv SF at the perimeter. And i think your SF-PF can defend insde?

This Post:
00
215011.15 in reply to 215011.14
Date: 5/7/2012 8:08:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
Since my league is quite weak, I always chose 3-2 defense no matter what offense my opponent played. It was more important for me to stop their offensive flow. This would mitigate the 3-2 weakness, because if I stop the offense from initiating, I worry less about their inside game. Sadly here it wasn't so, as this team is two stops above all the other opponents. I still think my team is better, but I chose wrong defensive tactic. I had the team on "autopilot".

My SF had OD 7, ID7 and SB7. His stats are solid for our D.IV and he had Proficient game shape. PF had ID 9 and C had ID 11.

This Post:
00
215011.16 in reply to 215011.15
Date: 5/7/2012 8:10:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
initiating the inside game isn't that complicated, if your SF if really outsided based it could makes sense but else 2-3 works better or man to man.

This Post:
00
215011.17 in reply to 215011.15
Date: 5/7/2012 10:35:12 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
219219
Never use zone, always do man to man if you stronger. Seems like you have learned this in a hard way.

Last edited by Gajus Julijus Cezaris at 5/7/2012 10:35:35 AM

This Post:
11
215011.18 in reply to 215011.17
Date: 5/8/2012 7:30:05 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
Yep. The harder the way, the more chance you don't screw it up again I guess!

Advertisement