BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > List of achievements

List of achievements

Set priority
Show messages by
From: LA-Nir

This Post:
22
233864.8 in reply to 233864.6
Date: 1/4/2013 12:04:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
343343
Old Farts (30) | Level 8 | 215 Teams Awarded| 14 Points

Get your facts firs then you can distort them as you please. Mark Twain
This Post:
33
233864.9 in reply to 233864.8
Date: 1/6/2013 3:38:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
222222
Rising Star
Had a great training week
Four Pops | Level 2 | 1/4/2013 | 5 Points

Last edited by Knowledge at 1/6/2013 3:39:17 AM

Message deleted
From: Dormouse

This Post:
44
233864.12 in reply to 233864.2
Date: 1/8/2013 6:30:01 AM
Hortatus
IV.51
Overall Posts Rated:
13091309
Star? Struck.
Star? Struck. ($7.5M) | Level 5 - Sold a player for more than $7.5M - 23 points
Star? Struck. ($10M) | Level 6 - Sold a player for more than $10M - 46 points

No, not you - the other one
Mirror, mirror | Level 6 - Had two players with the exact same face on your team - 207 points

For those interested:http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/fedoverview.aspx?fe...

This Post:
22
233864.14 in reply to 233864.13
Date: 1/8/2013 1:18:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
774774
So ridiculous the point values:

PD > 1000 | Level 4 | 3 Points
Star? Struck. ($10M) | Level 6 - Sold a player for more than $10M - 46 points

The first required an entire season of greatness for 3 whole points.
The second was a one time transaction by either (or both) a crazy economy or dumb buyer shelling out too much cash. Plus a $10M sale isn't even achievable anymore.

I realize it's just for fun, but are they just picking random values out of a hat?

*Michael Jordan award for a player wearing #23 to score 23 points in a game | 19 points (not 23)

The young guns is the most ridiculous. Start a new team, cut everyone, train 3 18 year olds. Bam! 208 points - more than a lot of actual decent achievements combined.

Last edited by Kumiko (CAN U21) at 1/8/2013 1:27:47 PM

If you remember me, then I don't care if everyone else forgets.
This Post:
11
233864.16 in reply to 233864.14
Date: 1/9/2013 5:45:54 AM
Hortatus
IV.51
Overall Posts Rated:
13091309
I think the scores are assigned to the rarity of achivements .. is therefore more rare achievement higher is its score .. without nothing else .. maybe we propose an alternative method .. is still evolving ..

Advertisement