BuzzerBeater Forums

Utopia - II.2 > Season 35

Season 35

Set priority
Show messages by
From: TnT

This Post:
00
280324.8 in reply to 280324.6
Date: 8/28/2016 7:55:52 PM
Beware of Dogs
NBBA
Overall Posts Rated:
8989
It looks as Pelevalli will promote as well basing on record. Congrats.


Unfortunately I don't think so.
I'm the third team not promoted based on record and only the first two will be promoted.
The defeat against Men for all season (Men for all season again grrrrrr!!!!) was fundamental.

Congrats for the promotion (y)



If I'm not mistaken, conference winners are ranked higher than non-conference winner, regardless of record. That would put you in #2 if I'm right. :)

BB-Perpete, can you please shed some light on the promotion rules for non-league winners?

From: TnT

This Post:
00
280324.9 in reply to 280324.3
Date: 8/29/2016 1:53:30 AM
Beware of Dogs
NBBA
Overall Posts Rated:
8989
Congratulations to Puppies, this title was well deserved :)


Thank you! Somehow I overlooked your post earlier.

Last edited by TnT at 8/29/2016 1:55:44 AM

From: Pelevialli

To: TnT
This Post:
00
280324.10 in reply to 280324.8
Date: 8/29/2016 5:30:12 AM
Pelevialli
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
2222
Second Team:
Pelevialli II
It looks as Pelevalli will promote as well basing on record. Congrats.


Unfortunately I don't think so.
I'm the third team not promoted based on record and only the first two will be promoted.
The defeat against Men for all season (Men for all season again grrrrrr!!!!) was fundamental.

Congrats for the promotion



If I'm not mistaken, conference winners are ranked higher than non-conference winner, regardless of record. That would put you in #2 if I'm right.

BB-Perpete, can you please shed some light on the promotion rules for non-league winners?


Let's wait and see.
I hope you are right: I could not bear another defeat against Men for all season!!!!

This Post:
00
280324.11 in reply to 280324.10
Date: 8/29/2016 6:05:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3434
That was a sweet victory! Thought I would give the gave away to get better form for players, Szeponik had 80 minutes that week, but I take any win I can get. Had a shot to win the league, but I got greedy and also took Baikal Medvedjanok lightly. If I had used a different training, I would have used a different lineup and think I would have won the quarterfinals. Congratulations to the winner also.

This Post:
00
280324.12 in reply to 280324.11
Date: 8/29/2016 11:36:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
99
Congrats to Beware of Puppies and Pelevialli and good luck in the upper level.

Hope to see you one day in Heaven !

From: TnT

This Post:
00
280324.14 in reply to 280324.13
Date: 8/29/2016 4:09:24 PM
Beware of Dogs
NBBA
Overall Posts Rated:
8989

It depends on the cases, but we often would see users tanking the second game to get a third game. Now, if your best chance to win the final is by winning the second game, you will not throw it away. At least, now, you only possibly tank games during finals for tactical reason. Before, it wasn't unusual to see agreement between the two users to just go for three games and not care who would win.


I'm confused (which is nothing new) ... trying to find the original news post on this but I can't find it. Can you please remind me again? Both teams get the 3rd game bonus money, regardless if they play a third game or not. Is that correct?


Conference position is more important than record yes. Someone ranked #1 with 18 wins will be bot promoted before someone ranked #2 with 19 wins.


There you go Pelevialli. You are going to Heaven! (party)

From: Pelevialli

To: TnT
This Post:
00
280324.15 in reply to 280324.14
Date: 8/29/2016 4:13:02 PM
Pelevialli
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
2222
Second Team:
Pelevialli II

There you go Pelevialli. You are going to Heaven!


Incredible!!!!! but I'n not ready for heaven, I'm still young

From: TnT

This Post:
00
280324.17 in reply to 280324.16
Date: 8/29/2016 4:33:19 PM
Beware of Dogs
NBBA
Overall Posts Rated:
8989

It depends on the cases, but we often would see users tanking the second game to get a third game. Now, if your best chance to win the final is by winning the second game, you will not throw it away. At least, now, you only possibly tank games during finals for tactical reason. Before, it wasn't unusual to see agreement between the two users to just go for three games and not care who would win.


I'm confused (which is nothing new) ... trying to find the original news post on this but I can't find it. Can you please remind me again? Both teams get the 3rd game bonus money, regardless if they play a third game or not. Is that correct?


There is no more attendance revenue for the third game, but there is some kind of prize money. What you got and half that for the losing team. Value varies depending on the league level.


I had initially thought the prize money was only for playing a third game and that was why I was confused to why anyone wouldn't want to push for a game 3. Thank you!