BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Re-modeling Arenas...

Re-modeling Arenas... (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
282325.8 in reply to 282325.7
Date: 9/25/2016 6:55:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
117117
I think it would be beneficial to be able re-arrange our arenas, at a cost.


It would be more beneficial to lower ticket prices and fill seats, at no cost.

This Post:
00
282325.9 in reply to 282325.8
Date: 9/25/2016 7:09:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
Dude... sheesh... it's "end-game content". If you think that the post is entirely about *efficiency*, you're in the wrong thread.

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
This Post:
00
282325.10 in reply to 282325.9
Date: 9/25/2016 7:34:37 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
117117
I think you're missing the point. Paying to knock down seats you don't use serves no purpose other than costing you money. Even if the seats can't be filled by lowering prices, you're paying to remove something you paid for, which you'll probably pay to rebuild again later.

It costs you nothing to keep excess seats. I don't see the point in bb's coding a system that isn't an issue. Time and effort for no real purpose would be the negative you asked the community for in your original post.

From: Phyr

This Post:
00
282325.11 in reply to 282325.9
Date: 9/25/2016 8:02:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
654654
ok then all your ideas were terrible. cheers.

From: Knecht

This Post:
11
282325.12 in reply to 282325.9
Date: 9/26/2016 4:53:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
16031603
I`d rather see the arena start "decaying" and thus either requiring to pay an upkeep and/or build a new one, once the quality/level reaches a certain low point (like every 25 seasons or so).

Größter Knecht aller Zeiten aka His Excellency aka President for Life aka Field Marshal Al Hadji aka Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Seas aka aka Conqueror of the Buzzerbeater Empire in Europe in General and Austria in Particular
From: malice

To: Phyr
This Post:
00
282325.14 in reply to 282325.11
Date: 9/26/2016 8:25:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
ok then all your ideas were terrible. cheers.

Calm down, dude. No need for the angry retorts. Anyway, I'm fine with having a different opinion to you...

Last edited by malice at 9/26/2016 8:44:45 AM

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
From: malice

This Post:
00
282325.15 in reply to 282325.12
Date: 9/26/2016 8:30:37 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
I`d rather see the arena start "decaying" and thus either requiring to pay an upkeep and/or build a new one, once the quality/level reaches a certain low point (like every 25 seasons or so).

This too is something I think would be rather cool, and could get behind.

But hey! Can't have it, because it *doesn't serve an actual purpose* (according to some).

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
This Post:
00
282325.16 in reply to 282325.10
Date: 9/26/2016 8:39:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
I think you're missing the point. Paying to knock down seats you don't use serves no purpose other than costing you money. Even if the seats can't be filled by lowering prices, you're paying to remove something you paid for, which you'll probably pay to rebuild again later.

It costs you nothing to keep excess seats. I don't see the point in bb's coding a system that isn't an issue. Time and effort for no real purpose would be the negative you asked the community for in your original post.

Well... given I started the thread, no... I'm not missing the point. My point may have been lacking in clarity - but *I get it* as far as *the point there to be had*!
You can argue a differing point of view/opinion to my proposition, and what you're saying is completely valid/viable. Just... if I was merely sticking to valid/viable/efficient, I think I would have quit this game years ago (like... sticking with an all-local team even tho' the market simply makes that an inefficient way to play).

And... "isn't an issue" - it'd largely be a somewhat minor thing, I guess. the BBs had no problem with coding in completely cosmetic changes recently... I doubt something like this that would be completely voluntary to do wouldn't be that much of an issue - but like I said: it's not the first time I've suggested this.

Thanks for your input, and civility.

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
This Post:
00
282325.17 in reply to 282325.13
Date: 9/26/2016 9:43:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
16031603
I`d rather see the arena start "decaying" and thus either requiring to pay an upkeep and/or build a new one, once the quality/level reaches a certain low point (like every 25 seasons or so).


If you have "arena over 15k and are in D4 for 10 seasons, you should pay X for a new paint job on your unused seats". Something like that ?


No. It does not depend if the seats are used or not (actually unused seats should stay in good shape for longer time), every arena gets older and thus needs to be renovated or rebuilt once in a while.

Größter Knecht aller Zeiten aka His Excellency aka President for Life aka Field Marshal Al Hadji aka Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Seas aka aka Conqueror of the Buzzerbeater Empire in Europe in General and Austria in Particular
This Post:
00
282325.18 in reply to 282325.15
Date: 9/26/2016 4:43:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
117117
I`d rather see the arena start "decaying" and thus either requiring to pay an upkeep and/or build a new one, once the quality/level reaches a certain low point (like every 25 seasons or so).


This too is something I think would be rather cool, and could get behind.

But hey! Can't have it, because it *doesn't serve an actual purpose* (according to some)


This is a completely different concept to what you described. If the bb's still believe there is too much money in circulation, this would serve a purpose. Simply paying to remove seats that you already paid for that cost nothing to keep was your suggestion, but that doesn't mean a better suggestion can't come from it.

Given how easy it is to negatively impact the already unstable economy, I'll stay with the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" vote for now.

Advertisement