BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Transfer limit

Transfer limit

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
73785.9 in reply to 73785.8
Date: 2/20/2009 2:04:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
Since no evidence or reasoning is offered, I am not sure how you came to this conclusion.

Just look at marketplace and look after good players transfer (I mean players who are quite expensive)

Actually, as long as it is not possible to make extremely large profits, this type of trading is an expected feature of the transfer market. So you're wrong.

How much money do you think is a "extremely large profits"? 2 million in a season isn't extremely large? I saw managers with this numbers.

So how much is normal? Is training 1 skill level normal? Or maybe 2? Or is it normal to spend 5 season training each player before you sell them?

It's another topic of discussion...

As someone pointed out, the system isn't broken, so there is no reason to fix it. As for your particular suggestion, there is a cost for having a player on your team, his salary, which being paid weekly regardless of the minutes played.

The system isn't broken, but it isn't perfect and can be upgraded.

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
73785.10 in reply to 73785.9
Date: 2/20/2009 4:22:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
So how much is normal? Is training 1 skill level normal? Or maybe 2? Or is it normal to spend 5 season training each player before you sell them?



It's another topic of discussion...


no thats the question for this topic, if you just train one or two skills, you sell him fast after buying it, with profit.

Actually, as long as it is not possible to make extremely large profits, this type of trading is an expected feature of the transfer market. So you're wrong.


How much money do you think is a "extremely large profits"? 2 million in a season isn't extremely large? I saw managers with this numbers.


Really with high cost players? I traded a bit with minute fillers(guys i bought for 1k for the friendly), and i got 14 transfers and just get 70% of the sum of them. So if you buy and good player you need to make, 42% profit after making a few transfer to sell them with +/- 0.

With cheap player you could easily makes 5-10* of the buying sum, so it could work with them, but i don't know how it works with normal transfer when you make masses of them, because i would say that it was with me a +/- thing when i was going to sell a trainee with 2% extra fee next season for 5 Million then i have to make large profit with mickey mouse transfer in the past.

This Post:
00
73785.12 in reply to 73785.11
Date: 2/20/2009 7:20:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
If you don't see anything it's you problem. It was only my suggestion and it was my opinion. If you think that it is normal that player reselling is a good idea, it is you opinion. But problem with transfers is real and I'm not the only man, who think so. In our Russian forum was a discussion about this and i'm not the only who think so.
I can gather information to approve my suggetion about profit, but i think that it is only waste of time, because developers and persons like you think that there is no problem.
You have made a lot of progress in it game and you don't need any progress in that game, so you don't want to change anything. But when you lose championship to the manager who build his team on reselling you will remember my suggestions...

From: dhoff

This Post:
00
73785.13 in reply to 73785.12
Date: 2/20/2009 8:22:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
If you don't see anything it's you problem.


You make a compelling argument.

From: Docker

This Post:
00
73785.14 in reply to 73785.13
Date: 2/20/2009 9:23:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
:P
Sorry, but I was irritated by an argument "I don't think anything, so there is no need to change it".

This Post:
00
73785.16 in reply to 73785.15
Date: 2/20/2009 6:20:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
You're suggesting the change, so you need to convince everyone why it's needed. That's how it works.
As far as I am concerned, I see an system that is already implemented and which works. So yes, for me there is no need to change it until I am convinced that a superior solution exists.

If you don't want to make any changes then there is no way to change your opinion;)
It is a suggestion and need to be discussed, but I see that this forum isn't popular. I didn't see any discussion, I saw only aggression and unwillingness to discuss anything.
Sadly, I don't think you have managed to convince anyone in the existence of such a solution.

It's better to voice only your decision and give everyone chance to voice there opinion. You opinion and opion of other people can be different;)

This Post:
00
73785.18 in reply to 73785.15
Date: 2/22/2009 7:56:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
:P
Sorry, but I was irritated by an argument "I don't think anything, so there is no need to change it".

You're suggesting the change, so you need to convince everyone why it's needed. That's how it works.

Are you serious?

Advertisement