BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > 5th place teams??

5th place teams??

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
89343.8 in reply to 89343.7
Date: 5/14/2009 4:51:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
112112
Why change it when it reflects the NBA?

By reflecting the NBA I mean that teams when they realize they aren't going to make the playoffs do in some cases tank it to get a better draft pick.

If you feel the system is flawed how do you suggest to fix it? Poking a stick at the "problem" only helps if a valid solution is also suggested.

Are you suggesting that the 5th place teams are included in relegation? Certainly they don't belong in the playoffs as adding 5th place alone as a wild-card would disrupt the playoff schedule.

FatCurry

This Post:
00
89343.9 in reply to 89343.8
Date: 5/14/2009 5:04:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
There are still suggestion board if you want. You don't even consider impact on attendance, do you?

7th relegating is a nonsense, there are way unbalanced conferences in some divisions.

This Post:
00
89343.11 in reply to 89343.1
Date: 5/14/2009 6:55:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
just only put 5 different people in each game that will get 10 people 48 minutes

This Post:
00
89343.12 in reply to 89343.11
Date: 5/14/2009 7:48:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6565
what does really make you think more games will be better for training? three games will give you 48 minutes for 3 players but two games will train two players more than in the first case, at least i know it that way.

This Post:
00
89343.13 in reply to 89343.12
Date: 5/14/2009 8:11:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3838
once a player gets 48 minute he gets 100% of training... it doesn't matter if he gets 48 or 68, it's the same
with three games you can give 5 players full training if you train two positions (well six if in 3 games you put no replacements on the position you train, but that's risky for the game result, injuries and they can foul out)
3 games is always better for training than two

This Post:
00
89343.14 in reply to 89343.13
Date: 5/15/2009 1:47:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
6565
but when 3 players instead of 2 gets training, effect of training drops right? or why do people prefer one position training instead of two position training?

This Post:
00
89343.15 in reply to 89343.14
Date: 5/15/2009 2:52:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
but when 3 players instead of 2 gets training, effect of training drops right? or why do people prefer one position training instead of two position training?


because if you train less positions you get more training , but have fewer trainingsspace ....

Just fewer training spaces, don't make training faster - so you don't profitate from it when you don't make an scrimmage ;)

This Post:
00
89343.16 in reply to 89343.15
Date: 5/15/2009 3:16:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
6565
yes but many people insisted on that more trainees results in less training for each. so if you play less, your training time will reduce but 48-minute trainees will get the boosted training as a result of lower number of trainees.

This Post:
00
89343.17 in reply to 89343.16
Date: 5/15/2009 3:21:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
joking or for real?

Trainingplaces are dfferent then match per week, it just look how many psoitions you train for spped not how much guys you train there. If a lucky fan plays on training position you don't get extra training.

This Post:
00
89343.18 in reply to 89343.17
Date: 5/15/2009 4:00:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
6565
it was mentioned numerous times that number of players trained affects the level of training.

if you are sure, i wont object anyway. in your case, a team plays 7 matches in a week will get 48*7 equal training minutes to a team plays 1 game and gets 48*1 training minutes considering training scheme is same for both??


Advertisement