BuzzerBeater Forums

Well, you can think that i made team for strictly LI tactics, which is a part a true.Still, i was thinking how to play and other tactics, especially i was successful in patient and isolation.
At the other hand, i do not claim that my was dominant for outside tactics or whatsoever.
My point was that i had really, really good games on patient, even teams from my league used to predict that i would play it

Oh I'm sure. A team like yours that thrived on 1v1 inside play would certainly do well isolating that matchup to their best scoring option.

And about Chaperon, he was much better then he is on your post.That was how he looks at 25 yrs or so.
I trained him until 32, that would tell you something...

I get that now. We had pictures on the offsite but clearly they were inaccurate.

i think tactic doesnt mean anything without good team, so for me, in this game, the most important thing is to have well built team :)

Makes sense. I think it would be quite interesting to hear more about the reasoning behind your team, I interview teams for the USA forums. It would be interesting to get your answers for an international edition.

Well, you can think that i made team for strictly LI tactics, which is a part a true.Still, i was thinking how to play and other tactics, especially i was successful in patient and isolation.
At the other hand, i do not claim that my was dominant for outside tactics or whatsoever.
My point was that i had really, really good games on patient, even teams from my league used to predict that i would play it

Oh I'm sure. A team like yours that thrived on 1v1 inside play would certainly do well isolating that matchup to their best scoring option.

And about Chaperon, he was much better then he is on your post.That was how he looks at 25 yrs or so.
I trained him until 32, that would tell you something...

I get that now. We had pictures on the offsite but clearly they were inaccurate.

i think tactic doesnt mean anything without good team, so for me, in this game, the most important thing is to have well built team

Makes sense. I think it would be quite interesting to hear more about the reasoning behind your team, I interview teams for the USA forums. It would be interesting to get your answers for an international edition.

i would be honored to answer on it.

What farms teams do you keep talking about? You keep talking me about these farm teams that hurt BB but no one sees them. Can you send me a link to a team that is a "farm team"?

Now that you mentioned players from the same managers train U21 and NT and don't compete I see some suspects. But you can't prove anything because some people just enjoy training U21/NT. Are these farm teams illegal? If you have just one team and train U21 or NT how's that cheating?

...
For this reason I think training the highest level skills, highest level trainers or something along those lines should be limited to higher divisions, to ensure that fake teams in the lower leagues aren't eating up all the NT spots with players that never play in higher level but just sit around on farm team in bottom division.

I would like to see a realism where the best players are playing in the top professional leagues in the world.

I would love to see a player (thru his agent ofcourse) reject a move to your club IF he think he is better then the league-level you are playing at at the moment.

Setting this up in BB could be a daunting task, but doable.
A team collects some sort of "Transferpoints", based on current WR, NR and level of his league he currently playing in.
A player will only accept a transfer to a team with sufficient "Transferpoints".
Teams in the players homecountry gets a little bonus on the "Transferpoints".
Maybe last season or two could affect.
Players already on your team will not be affected. (See Kobe is still cashing checks from Lakers ;-) )

A player who will not sign with your team is shown on the TL with an disabled (grey) Bid-button and some explaning text next to it.
Supporters could filter these players out (feature!). Blocking them from view as a default is not a good way to go.

Thats the end of this OT-post =)