BuzzerBeater Forums

There are indeed an individual salary cap linked to the team ranking. Maybe he's talking about that.

True, totally true. I didn't think about that one though, because that would be a big error to try to buy player at half that salary cap for almost anybody.

So if this is what he is suggesting, the answer is simple, no.

I could not agree more with you.

It would be nice if there was a single button to click to go to my Utopia team. It is rather difficult to have to click on my team name then scroll down and hit the link to switch teams especially on a smart phone.

It also would be great to have the option to add my Utopia team to my score board. It's a little annoying to have to navigate to the team and then view the game if I am already watching another.

Last edited by Prof. Bricks at 7/29/2014 12:05:27 PM

I have 2 little suggestions:
First, add option with the possibility of not receive invitation in the PL(auto message etc).
Second, on the player page, if he is injured, add info about his initial injury duration (example: player was injured for 5 weeks, but 2 weeks passed, so on his page is injured for 3 weeks and initial duration injury 5 weeks.

I think that when it says this player has been viewd --- times when he is up for sale it should say --- users have viewed him.

seems ok to me?

i mean your suggestion to me means the same thing - does it not mean the same in Canada?

I mean, its English right, you can pretty much say what you want and its correct pronunciation.

Oh sorry, I was tired last night.
It means to show how many users have viewed him instead of the amount of times he has been viewed.

ah ok
so if i view a player 30 times, it would only show once.
yerrrrrrrrr could do. id be down with that.

I like your idea of capping the number of players a team could have on its roster, but I dont believe that 12 is a big enough number.

I generally run with between 12 to 14 players on my roster at any one time so as to have enough players to enable minutes to be evenly balanced between my best 10.

I would suggest that 16 would be a good maximum number of players to enforce.

I.e a manager would be unable to buy more players if they already have 16 players on their roster.

This would actually be a great rule/control for new managers in the game and would help themplay the game better

Ofcourse the issue of what would happen if a manager already had 16 players come draft time when 3 draftees are to be added is a problem.

Perhaps a warning message could be sent that if they did not sell or sack 3 of their players, within a week of draftees being added to their team, then the 3 players who were the oldest who were already on their roster would automatically be put up for sale.

a supporter feature might be that any players that the team had in their hall of fame would be exempt from the maximum number.

also while we are on the Hall of Fame it would be great if their was a symbol that could be displayed on the players profile or picture which indicated to all the player was indeed in that teams Hall of Fame.

ofcourse this symbol on the player would only be displayed whilst the player who was inducted into the hall of fame was still active on the team which inducted him into the hall of fame

Last edited by Sid Vicious at 8/11/2014 2:17:14 PM