BuzzerBeater Forums

That's your advice? If you have nothing to say on the matter then all of a sudden you get rude. If you no have inclinations on the game then how am I wrong?? You no theory to dispute it beyond your personal baised opinion which you say you don't have.?. Which one is it..?? Do you have a opinion that make me wrong?? IF so then come out and say it??? I have one in theory.. you no base merits to back up what your saying because your confused. Your sitting here saying "I don't have a opinion on how it work nor a theory but your wrong but just so you know LOL, i don't know how it works"?. Which way do you want to go Sir

Do you want to debate or do you want to discredits others with no solid theory's.?> I have my own theory's on the defense with facts to back it up. So how are you going to tell me and other how 3-2 , 2-3 works. It's right in the rule book how it works . Go look at what I said its the exact same thing. You didn't know? Or was you to busy trying to dis credit with no merits or facts to back what you claim is false, Beside a baised opinion of false to your yourself .

If your teacher told you that then she/he was right , because this perfect example for that. Which you are not doing . You need to take heed in the advice your teacher gave you. Mind what you hear. When you get theory then come back talk until then good day and and use the advice of your elders in right fashion ,not when you wish to do so..


Last edited by Mr. Glass at 5/7/2013 7:23:28 PM

This is very funny because this all originated from your original comments which suggested you have the game engine down to a science when its pretty to obvious to even novice managers that the game engine sadly does not work the way you presume.
The fact that your general ignorance of tried and tested methods of playing this game and your all so mighty knowledge of all facets of the game engine is pretty obvious on many threads means thats its pointless arguing this any further.

The game is science now ok.. I thought it was math.hmm.Also keep assuming that I assume. A theory is not a fact. its a opinion based on few solid things that lead to something bigger in thought and beliefs.

What I read is whole of nothing on Sb by you. Please once more let me see your theory on Sb.. I keep forgetting you have something to say very important but when I re read your paragraphs it just full of nothing in Sb..?? SO PLease highlight them for me when you get the time do?? If it ok to do , Because I cant seem to find your theory in the paragraphs.

I agree it pretty pointless arguing this any further you no have theory on Sb and tactics.. Then claim some else is wrong in theory of belief.. That's what i find funny the most. Come back when have you theory on SB not some lip with vigor on personal opinion of others. How about that.

See what I did there I shot blocked "Swats"

.

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 5/9/2013 2:59:58 PM

What I read is whole of nothing on Sb by you. Please once more let me see your theory on Sb.. I keep forgetting you have something to say very important but when I re read your paragraphs it just full of nothing in Sb..?? SO PLease highlight them for me when you get the time do?? If it ok to do , Because I cant seem to find your theory in the paragraphs.

I agree it pretty pointless arguing this any further you no have theory on Sb and tactics.. Then claim some else is wrong in theory of belief.. That's what i find funny the most. Come back when have you theory on SB not some lip with vigor on personal opinion of others. How about that.

While I have no dog in this fight, I hate the use of bad logic to prove a point, and your logic here is specious at best. For example, I don't need to know how to bake a cake to know when someone else's cake tastes awful. I mean, I do know how to bake cakes and everything, but it doesn't take a significant level of expertise to recognize when an error is so fundamental.

He doesn't even have a idea what a twinkie is yet and still he wants idea or say what cake suppose to look like a cake is thats the logic of him. Then he's a hyprocrite..

.. He doesn't even have any that a basic thought of view ?? Not even a theory, So gp look at his post where is his theory on Sb?? If you can find it please copy paste it for me because, i cant seem to find it..

If you can please show me, all I saw was a bunch of off topic vigor lol

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 5/9/2013 8:57:12 PM

Lets go back t the matter of my theory. I said 3-2 and 2-3 zone produce more/ and should produce shot blocks within the engine. 3-2 changes to 2-1-2 depending on sf skills and produce turn overs and more blks..

He cant say I don't have any inclinations on the matter.. he has give me a theory why im wrong beyond go look in the rules books. Because if we go that way it agrees with I just said up to matter of" 3-2 changing 2-1-2 on the sf skill to produce more blks and turnover in a defensive way:.. Which is my theory of how shot blocks will be working in zones

Thats what im calling him out on.. I have every right to call him out on it, to better my thinking methods on my theory to re- observe the matter. but thing is he has no theory to do such so he no right to come and say your wrong because it doesnt look or look feel right to him . if that is case then he does have theory and same theory he is using is the BB rule book . which agrees with what im saying up to matter of the "3-2 zone shifting to 3-2 collapse(2-1-2) depending on the sf skills.

Im on topic, I hope that clears up the matter.

I have a theory 3-2 zone turn 3-2 collasape 1-2-2 which is a form 3-2. where the sf swing behind the guard to trap them or the big to block and create turnovers. my eror of before callin 2-1-3 which a form of 2-3 zone

I have had games where of has a few block and a lot of steals.. the most of them coming in 3-2 zone

http://www.breakthroughbasketball.com/defense/3-2zone.html


click the link youll what im trying to say I have seen thins in games