BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Committee for the Rights of Small Forwards

Committee for the Rights of Small Forwards

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
67212.83 in reply to 67212.82
Date: 1/7/2009 6:32:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
no no no wait. 3 pos of training is absurd, I have not created my SF with 3 position training.

This Post:
00
67212.84 in reply to 67212.83
Date: 1/7/2009 6:38:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
You just owned yourself. I hope you realise that:)

From: waggyrob

This Post:
00
67212.85 in reply to 67212.77
Date: 1/7/2009 6:48:57 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
As leagues become more competitive from the top down, current SF training will become even more difficult.


Let the lower league teams train the gun SF's & the higher league teams can buy them - all about sacrifice & deciding what is important for you in BB

This Post:
00
67212.86 in reply to 67212.79
Date: 1/7/2009 8:46:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
You can do some pretty good damage with a SF that has good IS and little else playing look inside.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
67212.89 in reply to 67212.87
Date: 1/7/2009 9:06:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
Sure it is. A uni-skilled player at any other position is useless. SF are so underdeveloped they can be successful.

Last edited by brian at 1/7/2009 9:06:22 AM

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
67212.91 in reply to 67212.84
Date: 1/7/2009 9:20:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
it's impossible to train defence fo 3 position,is very slow when i mtrian 2 positions i dont'wnt to think 3 positions...

This Post:
00
67212.92 in reply to 67212.90
Date: 1/7/2009 9:44:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
SFs are just fine


I your "humble" opinion

there is just a littler wider variety of three-skill combinations that work there


....because most players at that position are underdeveloped, or are better suited for another position.

disaster for people who are allergic to thinking


*shakes head*

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
67212.93 in reply to 67212.91
Date: 1/7/2009 10:00:12 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Exactly you do not want to think. If I just want to train my PF I let him play at C. If you do not want to train SF with 3 position training then you have to play him at PF or SG etc and can even go C or PG. Yes you might give your opponent easier time but you have to lose something in order to gain something.

All I can read out of this thread is one thing make the game easier nothing else. Use your brains to buy SF-s that are already skilled at both def (yes you have to pay more but isn't that the point?) and then develop his other skills.

And btw this discussion is not getting anywhere and the SF only position training will be abused by PF's and SG's you can count on that if this petition goes through.

Advertisement