BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > BuzzerBeater Arenas

BuzzerBeater Arenas

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
56772.84 in reply to 56772.76
Date: 2/23/2009 6:17:26 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
you are too smart to understand that the choice of builidng arenas very big(40k,not 10-15 k as the yours),gave too structural advantages as the system is now.This is becoming the "Right Choice",not one of the choises to develop the game of a single user.

@CrazyEye:The market is global,the discussion of incomes have to consider the differences between the various countries



The other way , you want to punish people who planned for a long time, when they start to get their advantage?

You don't punish the short time thinkers, who got their succes, and even could build their arenas and you forget also, that building arena could help you catch up to etablish teams, i just say flying munchkins. With a big arena is it much easier to get the necessary money you need for a top S5. So make your choiches, but you could compete even with a long term plan.

This Post:
00
56772.85 in reply to 56772.11
Date: 2/23/2009 6:56:12 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
how long did it take for u guys to make these lists??

This Post:
00
56772.86 in reply to 56772.84
Date: 2/23/2009 6:59:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
the short time thinkers were punished when the actual system was made two season ago,also this time the solution could be temporary

Last edited by Steve Karenn at 2/23/2009 6:59:48 AM

This Post:
00
56772.87 in reply to 56772.86
Date: 2/23/2009 7:04:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
äh why that?

You made profit before, with large arena even the guys with large arena pay lot more and it takes a lot longer for arena to get the invested money back. When you build your arena, is it important to get your investment back in time, so if you build before taxes, counting that you get more money after two season, and through taxes it needs nearly for, the short time thinker was in advance, because he invested in living capital and are still able to change there strategie ... The arena builders invested there money, without a change to change their strategie, even when the stratie wasn't that lucrative any more.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 2/23/2009 7:04:57 AM

This Post:
00
56772.88 in reply to 56772.87
Date: 2/23/2009 7:10:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
you are making large profit now,and you will continue to make it,as you have any cost for your arena,you'll make it only in a lesser measure

This Post:
00
56772.89 in reply to 56772.88
Date: 2/23/2009 7:12:32 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
you are making large profit now,and you will continue to make it,as you have any cost for your arena,you'll make it only in a lesser measure


i have no cost for the arena???

I paid a lot of cash in it, and this money i like to have back ;)

This Post:
00
56772.90 in reply to 56772.89
Date: 2/23/2009 7:20:05 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
you are making large profit now,and you will continue to make it,as you have any cost for your arena,you'll make it only in a lesser measure


i have no cost for the arena???

I paid a lot of cash in it, and this money i like to have back ;)

you have not weekly cost,and no fear,your money will be back,only you need a little more time

This Post:
00
56772.91 in reply to 56772.90
Date: 2/23/2009 7:59:01 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
if you invest money on the player you do it, because you promise rewards for it, you also don't say this guy has a small arena but good players so he get extra taxes when they sell them because it was unfair that this player give him succes and rewarded money for him ...

If he sell him, he also could build his arena, and after a while he could have an similiar rooster ... But to make building his arena silly afterwards is crank, i can not rebuild i don't get back the succes i spare for it ;)

And you don't forget that i also profit from it, because it will hit my rivals harder then me ;)

And who should pay the salarys from the top players, should we all start to trade to get the best players in the top divisisons? Or why should you punish teams who work solid, and amybe get for top division into the long run? And those teams, who doesn't build a solid team in your eyes get stay in the top div? Is it a manager game, or is it make failures and win game?


Last edited by CrazyEye at 2/23/2009 8:02:40 AM

This Post:
00
56772.92 in reply to 56772.90
Date: 2/23/2009 8:14:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Have you even calculated how long will it take for you to get the invested money back? Atleast in my league 4 this season. I tyed building and kept lowering the prices as you make more if you do not have the price maxed.
Let's use courtside seats. I had em @ 120 during the regular season. that's 11 home games. So I build 70 of those during the season totaling 140k cost. I did not build them at the start but during the season. It takes 1 seat to give you your money back if at price 120 in 16,7 games. So you have 11 home games a season the worst. So that's basically 1,5 seasons to just get your investment back and you need to win aswell. I do not actually see where is the problem here. I think it's normal that it takes a lot of time to get near to the guys in league 1. I don't think I should go up one league every season. Same is with training you actually lose no money on TL aswell.
It's not like you just build arena and win. You need a mixture of players and arena to be successful. There will be a cap for arenas and that is the attendance max with the lowest price per seat.

This Post:
00
56772.93 in reply to 56772.92
Date: 2/23/2009 8:57:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
yes,and this is why who have built great arenas have now a so great advantages,the top teams are not intersted,as also crazyeye says,because they have yet a great team and can manage with a good flexibility their choises but I and all new users,that started with a bad team and with the basic arena,have great difficulty to look at all the aspect,to build a decent team in short time and thinking about long run

Last edited by Steve Karenn at 2/23/2009 8:57:30 AM

This Post:
00
56772.94 in reply to 56772.83
Date: 2/23/2009 9:10:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
Defensive bunch here

I didn't bump this thread and bring up the issue feeling as anyone needed to be punished.

Did so because this is an issue to the long term balance of the game. Similar to when teams were making so much money in the early seasons that a radical overhaul had to be implemented without any prior notice. How'd that turn out? Was pretty painful for anyone that bought a player just before that announcement, as their investment dropped in half overnight.

I'm not proposing a solution, only bringing this up as there is still no apparent limit to the amount of attendance revenue generated. Could be wrong, but this seems to be a issue that will have to be addressed at some point.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
Advertisement