BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Better Training Method For SF

Better Training Method For SF

Set priority
Show messages by
From: CrazyEye

To: Coco
This Post:
00
174785.87 in reply to 174785.86
Date: 3/23/2011 11:34:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Hmmm, I think you don't know what you are talking about. The people hailed as best perimeter defenders in the NBA are Artest (6'7"), Wade (6'4"), Battier (6'8"). It is very hard to drive past these guys. On the other hand, the sub 6'3" players have a hard time keeping up strength-wise or even defending the pick and roll.


but there a lot more people at that size who struggle at guarding the perimeter, and i think the overall picture goes more to people of Wade size then the one of Battier(so that i would say he is more the exception then the rule). People like Ai would be good here, but true in reality they would suffer from there size.

But overall i think the size isn't reflected bad in this game.

From: pmfg10
This Post:
00
174785.88 in reply to 174785.87
Date: 3/23/2011 12:13:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
206206
I think people here are just comparing too much to the NBA.

This Post:
00
174785.89 in reply to 174785.88
Date: 3/23/2011 1:08:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5555
I think people here are just comparing too much to the NBA.


Comparing to real life, where in real life the SF is not like the kicker in American Football. NBA is by far the basketball everyone around the world is most familiar with so comparing from the NBA makes most sense than comparing to division II Greenland basketball team (if there is such thing even)

Last edited by Coach_Gil at 3/23/2011 1:10:17 PM

From: Coach_Gil

This Post:
00
174785.91 in reply to 174785.90
Date: 3/23/2011 2:57:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5555
This is starting to get off topic, if you can compare or not compare or how much emphasis comparison is drawn to the NBA its your opinion. Bottom line is that regardless of comparison, SF are inferior and are like the kickers in American Football. More or less you can find good players in PG,SG,SF,PF,C about equally wether in the NBA or Europe. It's blatant that SF are "the crappies" of BB and its blatant that its not like this in real life.

From: Coach_Gil

This Post:
00
174785.93 in reply to 174785.92
Date: 3/23/2011 4:49:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5555
You right, but apparently NBA Live were able to implement realistic player development in their franchise mode, that's something from real like that they were able to implement

This Post:
00
174785.95 in reply to 174785.77
Date: 3/23/2011 7:44:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191


The solution could be another couple of skills that would be faster to train the closer the height is to 6'7. i.e. vertical leap that could translate into JS and RB.


leaping is normally a stuff, the small guys could be better, and your system works exactly like the system today ;)



Yeah, but it's not about how far their feet are off the ground, is it? It's the leaping ability together with height and reach. Up to 6'7 you don't generally see a lot of loss in athleticism, but thanks to their height these players are the highest flyers in the game. Then towards 7'0 you generally see a notable reduction in leaping ability, which is however partly offset by height. So to make athleticism train fastest for SFs would make a perfect sense.

From: thylacine

This Post:
00
174785.96 in reply to 174785.90
Date: 3/23/2011 7:50:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
If you got a D.3 team in USA comparing it to a NBA team makes no sense at all imo.

What does it matter which level you play at. A 6'7 guy should still be more athletic than a 5'10, or 7'2 guy.

Advertisement