Yes, then his tactic caused mismatches, but very predictable mismatches.
It's not mismatches questions,1-3-1 just sucks(as like 2-3)
Agree, i hope BB's introduce new zones to have more tactical choices.
You are just criticising everything and everytime.
The NT system is awful for you, you have the disadvantage comparing to small countries, the tactics don't work for you and so on. Is there anything that yiu are satisfied with? :)
As for me, I'd say 2-3 and 1-3-1 are working in the proper way. At least I've seen lots of games won thanks to such a defence. For example, I could have won the final last season if I had chosen 2-3 (26092947)
About small countrys i dont care anymore, so dont blame me if i made some posts 1-2 seasons ago. About NT's i got my own opinion that its becoming the same season after season(but its ok).
I dont know if we are looking at the same game, but i'm sure that if you put a 2-3, do you think that your 16k SF that for sure has no more than 7-8 in ID can defend in front of IS of 13 to 15(aprox), do you think that putting that SF will make you defend better or it will make you defend worst?
Did you thought that if you had put a 2-3, how many points you think the other SG was going to score?
SG N. Ligouris 37 10 - 24 0 - 2 0 - 4 1 5 6 1 1 0 2 20 14,5
SF J. Ziach 47 6 - 17 1 - 4 3 - 3 4 7 2 5 0 1 4 16
I predict that SG was going to be over 20 points in front of a 2-3.
Last but not least he used a SG as a SF, and you think you need a zone 2-3?
Im also pretty sure that this SG playing as a SF was going also over 20 points.
I've also seen lot of games lost thanks to the 2-3
Last edited by Marot at 11/14/2010 12:17:26 PM