I have another suggestion: Match review report.
This review will cost manager say $50,000 (or something similar), but give the hints or more information about the opponent's individual players attributes.
Here is an example for
(88995208) : Forty two played the game pretty well, but was very unlucky to lose the game. Semeonas Kozurovas was unable to overcome Jimmy Lajarrige's sensational outside defence and turned the ball over 5 times. Grégory Lebec had wondrous outside defence and defended really well. As a back-up, strong block-shot skills gave Mathieu Furet 4 blocks. Prime time for Amir Parcero had already gone, Forty two needed another player for SG position if really want to win the game. Benjamin Mabille had average outside defence skills but profilic in rebounding, while Robert Lassalle is just strong in rebounding and proficient in ID. Cyril Thierry played excellent in centre position. Thierry Thiébaut had tremendous JS and prominent IS, so almost no chance to defend him. If no major change from Haute savoie Green Lions, maybe Forty two could try inside oriented offensive tactics next time they will meet.
The ratings of skills are not accurate, these were affected by GS. Say, wondrous outside defence means senational or prodigious.