BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Training Help, PLZ help!

Training Help, PLZ help!

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
140145.9 in reply to 140145.8
Date: 4/11/2010 9:39:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Well can't knock the approach. From my limited experience, your team looks pretty strong for one just over a season old.

This Post:
00
140145.10 in reply to 140145.9
Date: 4/11/2010 9:45:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
Thanks :)

This Post:
00
140145.11 in reply to 140145.7
Date: 4/11/2010 11:51:51 AM
Aussie Pride
ABBL
Overall Posts Rated:
544544
Well 2 position training gives you more total training then 1 position training it is just spread across more players. When your new and in the lower divisions i think a solid even team is enough to promote. It's more in the higher divisions where the 1 position trained stars with the high potential become more important. It's also a money thing if your doing 1 position training wages will rise fast especially on big men. It will also cost more to buy trainees because if u are doing 1 position training you will want high potential guys so you can train them for longer.

Last edited by aussie dude at 4/11/2010 11:52:49 AM

This Post:
00
140145.12 in reply to 140145.11
Date: 4/11/2010 12:24:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
It seems by that logic team training various attributes would be even better.

This Post:
00
140145.13 in reply to 140145.12
Date: 4/11/2010 12:32:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
No, because team training is wayyyyy too slow. Look at it this way: 3 players x full training = 3 full training for 1 position
For 2 position: 6 players x 70% training of 1 position = 4.2 players worth of full training.
For team training: 12 players x 15% training of 1 position = 1.8 players worth of full training. And personally I think that 15% is being generous.

So as you can see, 2 position training is the best for the team.

This Post:
00
140145.14 in reply to 140145.13
Date: 4/11/2010 1:12:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Upon what do you base your assumptions about the various training speeds?

I may be able to go along with 70% for 2 position, although how do you arrive at that precise figure, and not say 75% or 80%?

The team training figure also looks questionable.

Further, if you are going to allocate 3 players per position on the "specialist" trainings, then for the sake of fair comparison we should do the same with team training, which means 15 and not 12 players getting training.

This Post:
00
140145.15 in reply to 140145.14
Date: 4/11/2010 1:25:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
They were just estimates. I made my estimate by looking at the training speed analysis thread and noticed that there isn't too much difference between 1 position training and 2 position training. Most estimates change by about a week.

The team training estimate was a complete guess. But I know managers that have tried it and they have said that it can take 4 weeks and more for a pop in driving and that is one of the faster skills. From this I deduced that the team training is very very slow per person. Maybe if I change the estimate from 15% to 30% that would be more accurate perhaps.

It is far easier to get 3 players 48 minutes each than to get 15 players 48 minutes each.
But lets consider 15 players x 30% of 1 position training = 4.5 players worth of full training. Still not as good as 2 position training and we are being quite generous with the figures here especially in getting 15 players 48 minutes each.

This Post:
00
140145.17 in reply to 140145.15
Date: 4/11/2010 5:09:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Not to mention that with team training it is hardly likely you are going to have a competitive team filled with youngsters.

Certainly 2 position training is much more worthwhile, I would agree. Just playing devil's advocate a little.

From: JohnnyB
This Post:
00
140145.18 in reply to 140145.17
Date: 4/11/2010 5:20:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
343343
My experience after 6 seasons on the game, is indeed the 2 positions training is the best for a young team. Is the same route that i got too. Actually i started to train 1 position since the 2nd half of the last season, but again my team has great domestic success, and now i dont really need to fill any positions. I am on the process for upgrades. 1 player away to repeat my title, and i have plenty cash for that.

So in sum, if you are looking for team success your best bet is 2 position training. To chose 1 position should be 1)Have a player that can play on your NT, but you sacrifice the team development. 2)Be a team on a similar position like mine. Thats my opinion...

Advertisement