BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > first week salary

first week salary

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
179255.9 in reply to 179255.8
Date: 4/4/2011 3:10:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
740740
I agree that something should be done. But that means a player can be paid double his salary during one week? Where does that money go?

So maybe it would be better if when you sell a player on wednesday, you pay for his monday and tuesday salary, and the one who buys the player pays for the rest of the week.
Or you could say 2/5 for a league game and 1/5 for a scrimmage, or 1/3 for a league/cup game if you're still in the cup.
So if you are out of the cup, you sell a player after tuesday's game, you still pay 2/5 of his salary.
That means if you buy this player on wednesday and you sell him on sunday, next monday you still pay 2/3 of his salary if you're still in the cup, or else only 3/5.


this is to complicated.
this "first week salary" is something like SIGNING ON FEE, and it means that you give player some money just for signing contract with your team. it is normal thing in european football and basketball.


This Post:
00
179255.10 in reply to 179255.1
Date: 4/5/2011 11:58:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
740740
Did someone of BB's or GM's read this?

I hope I will get some reply from the stuff, but still no reply.

This Post:
00
179255.11 in reply to 179255.10
Date: 4/5/2011 12:03:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Did someone of BB's or GM's read this?

I hope I will get some reply from the stuff, but still no reply.


GM are just something like "sheriffs" here, we don't decide about changes and don't have further informations about planned changes.
But by the way this is my second post here, when it is so important for youu to get a statement from a "normal User" with a GM sign.

And the BB read it, but they don't discuss because their statement change normally the direction of the discussion.

This Post:
00
179255.12 in reply to 179255.11
Date: 4/5/2011 1:52:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
88
Hey guys. There was a thread started about a week ago with a in depth discussion on this. Check it out.

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/forum/read.aspx?thr...)

This Post:
00
179255.13 in reply to 179255.11
Date: 4/5/2011 2:08:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
740740
Did someone of BB's or GM's read this?

I hope I will get some reply from the stuff, but still no reply.


GM are just something like "sheriffs" here, we don't decide about changes and don't have further informations about planned changes.
But by the way this is my second post here, when it is so important for youu to get a statement from a "normal User" with a GM sign.

And the BB read it, but they don't discuss because their statement change normally the direction of the discussion.


sorry

it won't happen again))))

This Post:
00
179255.14 in reply to 179255.13
Date: 4/6/2011 5:42:05 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
Sorry to rain on this parade, but this suggestion won't change anything.
At the moment you can buy the player for 1 million and not pay salary.
If it changes so you have to pay salary straight up, this just means that the transfer price will be lower.
So you can now buy the player for 700k and pay 300k salary and it will cost the same as now.

This Post:
00
179255.15 in reply to 179255.14
Date: 4/6/2011 6:37:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
740740
Sorry to rain on this parade, but this suggestion won't change anything.
At the moment you can buy the player for 1 million and not pay salary.
If it changes so you have to pay salary straight up, this just means that the transfer price will be lower.
So you can now buy the player for 700k and pay 300k salary and it will cost the same as now.


but he will sell him for only 700k and be in minus for 300k + 20% of transfer fee. right now he buys for 1mil, then sell for 1 mil or more and he can be in plus becuse he is not paying salary.

so your answer is so wrong.

This Post:
00
179255.16 in reply to 179255.15
Date: 4/6/2011 8:25:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
hmm good point.
Although it depends on the following scenario:
If I buy a 300k player on Sunday afternoon, I would pay 1 weeks salary. Would I then have to pay the weeks salary on the Monday as well?

This Post:
00
179255.17 in reply to 179255.16
Date: 4/7/2011 1:51:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
740740
hmm good point.
Although it depends on the following scenario:
If I buy a 300k player on Sunday afternoon, I would pay 1 weeks salary. Would I then have to pay the weeks salary on the Monday as well?


as I said beore it is something like SIGNING ON FEE, a money that player gets just for joining the club.

and, like someone said, you can pay him a SEVERENCE FEE when he leaves club, just like stuff.

each one of this suggestions would make game more fair, than it is today.

This Post:
00
179255.18 in reply to 179255.17
Date: 4/7/2011 2:20:01 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
I'd rather see players have a contract than signing and severance fees.
Perhaps any player bought cannot be sold or fired within 4 weeks.

This Post:
00
179255.19 in reply to 179255.18
Date: 4/7/2011 2:24:54 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
but in combination with those monster such a contract could be killing for new teams, when the sums to buy them get back to sums you could afford with your starting money. One salary you could survive, even when it throw you back, four of them are a bit much in my eyes.

Advertisement