BuzzerBeater Forums

Non-BB Global (English) > Shaq: I'm done

Shaq: I'm done

Set priority
Show messages by
From: malice
This Post:
00
186343.10 in reply to 186343.9
Date: 6/3/2011 10:44:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
Love that immediately, LA came out and said "yes, we will be retiring that jersey".

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
This Post:
00
186343.11 in reply to 186343.8
Date: 6/5/2011 3:40:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137

Bill Russell
Lew Alcindor aka Kareem Abdul Jabbar
Wilt Chamberlain
Hakeem Olajuwon
Shaq


Honestly, for me...its:

Wilt
Abdul Jabber
Shaq
Russell
Ojabuwon

somewhere in there is George Mikan.

I never saw Wilt or Russell play, but I can look at their numbers. Russell, both and college, is better in terms of championships. But I don't honestly think that there was a player quite like Chamberlain. Shaq, in my lifetime, was certainly the most dominate player I've ever seen (including Kobe, Jordan and Olajuwon). Not for his entire career, but at his peak, I don't think there was ever a player as dominate as he was.

Also, I think George Mikan has to be in there somewhere. Would he have matched up aginst Wilt or Shaq or Howard? Probably not...but for his time, I think he was probably more dominate than Wilt, Jordan or Shaq.



This Post:
00
186343.12 in reply to 186343.11
Date: 6/5/2011 11:50:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
yea i could see why you'd put wilt #1 because the NBA did change many rules against his game but I only had wilt at 3 because of i guess championships but yea the rule changes against him definitely don't show on his stats or achievements.

and on shaq, at his height and weight, he was very athletic and there definitely wasn't another person near his size and athleticism.

good arguement

This Post:
00
186343.13 in reply to 186343.11
Date: 6/5/2011 4:14:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
If Shaq could have just hit his free throws I would probably have considered him the greatest so far.

This Post:
11
186343.14 in reply to 186343.11
Date: 6/5/2011 4:58:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
345345
Well, in my heart he is no.1. He is definitely no.1 of his time. But i like the fact that he is the last old school center I;ve seen in quite a while. Not afraid to get his hands dirty under the rim, not afraid of the big moments. A great legend.

From: malice
This Post:
00
186343.15 in reply to 186343.14
Date: 6/5/2011 5:38:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
I'd go Kareem #1, or Russell - because of what they achieved (Russell in the NBA, Kareem from HS-college-NBA).

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
This Post:
00
186343.17 in reply to 186343.16
Date: 6/5/2011 11:19:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
I think ever since the introduction of zone defenses being allowed in the NBA we have seen the slow death of the dominant big man. Still one or two around but certainly seems like a dying breed.

This Post:
00
186343.18 in reply to 186343.17
Date: 6/5/2011 11:53:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
Dunno about "dying out"... it's just that it's such an unique mix that truly dominant big men are kinda rare. I mean, that kind of size, with that kind of power... mixed with enough agility to utilize it. Rare 'tis.
Usually, there'll only be one or two in any generation playing. I'd suggest that Dwight Howard's of that ilk, and Andrew Bynum might be too.

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
This Post:
00
186343.19 in reply to 186343.18
Date: 6/6/2011 10:48:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
I disagree. There may not be Shaq or Howard like centers in abundance but the lack of even solid centers in the NBA is glaring. It has become more of a utility position than it used to be. I read an article in sporting news about production of centers in the NBA since zone D was introduced and the numbers support this theory. Of course numbers only show part of the picture and can be deceiving.

Advertisement