Sorry, I thought you mean't Division wise, not country wise, my mistake.
I understand what everyone is saying about ECONOMY in my country, but it's about playing on an even field in the B3, so 1% plays it, I'd like to make that 1.1%
I can develope a team quicker, yeah, but limited by the lower money in my country,TV contract, attendance from teams ranked low in the World etc, so I still wouldn't have the chance to compete with the teams from the bigger countries as my overall cap space is lower. It takes you longer to get there, granted, but & I've said this all through this post, if you make good decisions then you'll pass me as you have more money coming in than me. It's the tortise & the hare story, I start fast & run off into the lead, but if you stay the course you'll pass me in the end, inherently.
Now this is just what I'm seeing right now & may not be the actual case if I had done something differently, but all everyone, bar a couple of people, are saying is "Oh it's easier for you", at the start yes, but to compete all the way no it's not. What I'm trying to find out is what I'm missing, not have a age old conversation about small country Vs big country. Have I built this too quick, have I missed something, have I not done something, stuff like that. Or is this just a case of I have to load up & take a run at B3, instead of consistantly be a team people look for? Teams get knocked for loading up & making a run at the B3 as it's a version of tanking. I'm not looking to be that kind of team. I shouldn't have to be that kind of team, if certain criteria are even, match attendance for high COUNTRY RANKED games, TV contract etc.
Last edited by ClipCap at 8/8/2011 10:53:52 AM
Right is not a popularity contest!