BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > potential

potential

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
209521.9 in reply to 209521.8
Date: 2/10/2012 4:07:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
no, not when you suggest that every draft player would look the same ;)

Or you focus now on the third draft round, i didn't concentrate on.(in this case even the quality of trainee would decline, which makes starter more desirable)

This Post:
00
209521.10 in reply to 209521.1
Date: 2/12/2012 9:21:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
766766
the junk players have a purpose though.

eg: last season, i needed to manage game shape of my starters and bench during the finals. so i bought two guys who had a salary of like, $2k or something, both with really terrible potential... bench warmer, or something like that. these guys i played in the scrimmage, which id already previously booked.

so my point being, is that these low potential players become the scrubs that we buy for $1000 and then sell a few weeks later.
AND, i have a guy with Starter potential who was an excellent backup PF last seaon in Div III and probably could have started as well with some success.
So im not on you with this one sorry.