BuzzerBeater Forums

BB USA > Scouting for Draft

Scouting for Draft

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
228470.9 in reply to 228470.8
Date: 10/17/2012 9:19:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
6363
Just in this whole discussion, I want to clarify that potential makes absolutely no difference in how fast a player will pop at a given age. A 24 year old Hall of Famer will not pop any faster than a 24 year old allstar, assuming neither player is capped. Some of these comments sound like you think the higher potential will help the player pop faster, and that isn't the case.

This Post:
00
228470.10 in reply to 228470.9
Date: 10/17/2012 9:55:30 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
142142
It only affects how long you can train him, right??

This Post:
00
228470.11 in reply to 228470.10
Date: 10/17/2012 1:24:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6363
Kind of. It's all about the cap--it would take a HOF player longer to hit his cap than it would take for a star player. But it's not a matter of how long you train a player, it's a matter of what skills you train relative to the cap. You can train a superstar potential player and cap them out by the end of their 21yo season by pushing their most cap-heavy primaries, or you can train a balanced SF and train them until they're 25-26 without capping. For example, think of the difference between Marshall Ray this year ($12K salary) and Bud Saldana last year ($100K salary). But yes, in most cases a higher potential will mean you can train a player longer.

This Post:
00
228470.12 in reply to 228470.11
Date: 10/17/2012 3:17:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
7575
thanks for the input guys, at 24 with a HOF potential, I'm thinking I can get some pops on the primaries. His JR and OD are both strong, so I want at least a couple pops there, shouldn't be a problem I'm guessing.

From: Mudyez
This Post:
00
228470.13 in reply to 228470.11
Date: 5/27/2013 5:04:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
Can someone tell me what to look for while scouting? rating, potential, stats,...

I'm looking for guys I want to train myself and don't have much of a preference as of now.

I'm especially interested in knowing how to read the stats! Should I value these stats more then the orange balls, or can I forget about them?

say:
lets assume I'd like to get a SF and two of them look like:
1) 5balls 40min 7/15fg 1/3threes 2/2ft 1or 5tr 6as 5to 3stl 2 blk 1pf 17pts
2) 2balls 40min 12/19fg 1/4threes 7/9ft 0or 2tr 1as 2to 2stl 1blk 2pf 32pts
who do you like more?

furthermore I'd like to know if I should forget about a PG I like only because he is 6-10

From: Turtle

This Post:
00
228470.14 in reply to 228470.13
Date: 5/27/2013 9:55:53 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9393
Largely forget about them. The balls tell you about the actual skills. The box scores may give you a few rough ideas of what the player may be like. In this case, player 1 is much better, b/c 5 ball-skills. Don't even consider a player with 2-ball skills unless you've interviewed him for some reason and he has high potential.

What the box score can be useful for is getting a rough idea of some key skills. For example, a guard with 8+ rebounds likely has high rebounding, a center w/ 0 assists and 7 turnovers likely has atrocious passing, a player with 20 minutes played likely has really low stamina, a player who commits 4-5 fouls is likely very aggressive. But even these aren't 100% accurate, so plenty of experienced managers will say forget the box score altogether.

6'10" PG can be a great SF candidate. You know he'll have solid outside skills, and if he has good secondary inside skills then you're in business. Definitely do not forget about him.

This Post:
00
228470.16 in reply to 228470.15
Date: 5/27/2013 2:44:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
Thanks!

If he is a PG, will he always have the "PG"-trademark or can it change to e.g. SF?
And does it make a difference which official position a player is tagged with anyway?