BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Free Agent Market

Free Agent Market

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Axis123

This Post:
00
241377.9 in reply to 241377.6
Date: 5/22/2013 9:27:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
299299
we now will count down for under 30k
You've said this for a bit... I've been noticing a lot of teams going bot, but the user base doesn't seem to be dropping. Any evidence?

From: Axis123

This Post:
00
241377.10 in reply to 241377.9
Date: 5/22/2013 9:29:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
299299
Never mind, I answered my own question:

39878 active managers from over 227 countries around the world, playing in BuzzerBeater's 98 countries
It used to be over 40k.

From: HAHA

This Post:
00
241377.14 in reply to 241377.13
Date: 5/22/2013 12:34:12 PM
HAHA001
IBL
Overall Posts Rated:
454454
I like the free agent market ... this would provide a second chance for the retired players.

I believe this would lower down the current market price of players, since there would be more choices.

From: Park
This Post:
11
241377.16 in reply to 241377.15
Date: 5/25/2013 7:40:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3333
It's bad enough that there are any free agents besides NT players.

You train players for years hoping they will be something special only to have loads of similar players from deserted teams dumped on a decreasing userbase demeaning their value. Get rid of free agents.


From: Muffins

To: Park
This Post:
00
241377.18 in reply to 241377.16
Date: 5/26/2013 7:21:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2929
Having a "Free Agent Market" could possibly help Micronations in terms of talent pool. It is a place where young players (i.e 18 and 19y/o ONLY) with decent potential (say star and above) go to when their team goes bot or when they are fired. There won't be any bidding process but rather teams can buy them off immediately at a certain price, thus these players can stay in the "Free Agent Market" for as long as they have no team. However, upon reaching 20y/o, these players should be removed from the "Free Agent Market" and retire.


Gosh, I don't understand how people can only read part of the post and then say stuffs that are so off tangent.

Please do read properly, I believe what you're referring to is very different from the suggestion. You're talking about players trained for years and having free agents who possess similar skills, which highly suggests you're referring to veterans or at least well trained players. I'm referring to the rookies, notice I'm suggesting that players should be removed upon reaching 20 years old.

Advertisement