BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Cup bonus - free agents

Cup bonus - free agents

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
244598.9 in reply to 244598.1
Date: 6/21/2013 10:14:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
12001200
Hey!

As its not a suggestion yet, I wanted to start a discussion here. I was thinking about how to get rid of the free agents and came up with an idea to remove the bonus money for cup wins - on a global scale this would take out BILLIONS out of the economy, we could get rid of the free agents and maybe (?) raise the value of players on active teams.

As I don't know how much money is taken out of the game by selling free agents I cannot make a clear suggestion, maybe it would be enough to cut the bonus for early rounds? Anyone has some data on free agents sales?

The bolded part doesn't make any sense.
When people want to introduce changes, they should always think why the system works like that.
Cup prizes are there as a trade-off, so you either focus on league matches or cup matches. You can bet that if there was no prize I'd drop the cup at the first match (everyone would do that) since cup matches would be the same as scrimmages.
One of the things that work is the week set-up, don't even try touching it.

This Post:
00
244598.10 in reply to 244598.9
Date: 6/21/2013 4:01:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
16031603
The bolded part doesn't make any sense.
When people want to introduce changes, they should always think why the system works like that.
Cup prizes are there as a trade-off, so you either focus on league matches or cup matches.


Its one more TIE per week. So there is still a bonus, plus it has a huge impact on your fan survey.

Größter Knecht aller Zeiten aka His Excellency aka President for Life aka Field Marshal Al Hadji aka Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Seas aka aka Conqueror of the Buzzerbeater Empire in Europe in General and Austria in Particular
This Post:
11
244598.11 in reply to 244598.10
Date: 6/21/2013 4:13:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
to much money in the market is a good thing.. this will create more quality teams. I dotn don't see how it hurts the game. because a lot of team don't have any money. Its really dead weight arugement.. there is no clear cut answer.

I rather there be some money in the market than no money which the case today for a lot of team.. player are too high, you going to need the money.

its train or spend to aquire.. these two option don't hurt anything.






This Post:
00
244598.12 in reply to 244598.10
Date: 6/21/2013 4:23:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
The bolded part doesn't make any sense.
When people want to introduce changes, they should always think why the system works like that.
Cup prizes are there as a trade-off, so you either focus on league matches or cup matches.


Its one more TIE per week. So there is still a bonus, plus it has a huge impact on your fan survey.

A cup with no money prizes advantages still more top division teams,that can put more peacefully their reserves in the cup,than the lower division teams,that would not have the money,and to advance in the cup would still need to sacrifice their starters in the RS games,and this would balance with cup impact on fan survey

You are going noway trying to defend your idea.Cup prizes are needed,if you want to eliminate FA just stop triyng to swapping cap prizes for them

From: Mr. Glass

This Post:
00
244598.14 in reply to 244598.13
Date: 6/21/2013 8:47:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
I didn't say it made the players skill any better. I was saying it creates more money for lesser teams when they bring a quality player to the market from training.

The prices are already high due to user demands. Its a bidding system of user demands. Yes there is over pricing for under skilled players. But this fall on the system in place and user demand rather than too much money on the market and inflation out right. Also time of the gme maybe 18 seasons ago you could get hi skilled player for 200 thousand , now he is going for 20million in today market.

Nothing we can do about inflation in a bidding system as such other than look for quality. Even then your going to be having to pay a lot cash for it. Like I said it no easy answer.. I think as long as teams are spending on the market and newer manager can bring quality youth for major profit its ok. When teams stop spending on the market then there is a huge problem.



Last edited by Mr. Glass at 6/21/2013 9:20:09 PM

This Post:
00
244598.16 in reply to 244598.15
Date: 6/21/2013 9:30:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
Players still go for millions. I seen a few 30+ yrs old going for millions. if your looking for a nice pf/center yes they a are dime a dozen and they do come cheap if wait and look around.. But find a nice pg with all around skills.. it not going to happen for cheap.

I know I have looked. Every one is into big man thing . they are not hard to build, it quite simple to do. But build a all round pg not easy and buying one is even harder

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 6/21/2013 9:32:49 PM

This Post:
00
244598.17 in reply to 244598.1
Date: 6/21/2013 10:21:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
I was thinking about how to get rid of the free agents and came up with an idea to remove the bonus money for cup wins - on a global scale this would take out BILLIONS out of the economy, we could get rid of the free agents and maybe (?) raise the value of players on active teams.


That's a start, but I think we need to take away gate revenue and TV contract money to really get people to spend more money on the market. ;)

This Post:
00
244598.18 in reply to 244598.17
Date: 6/22/2013 4:15:32 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
16031603
I was thinking about how to get rid of the free agents and came up with an idea to remove the bonus money for cup wins - on a global scale this would take out BILLIONS out of the economy, we could get rid of the free agents and maybe (?) raise the value of players on active teams.


That's a start, but I think we need to take away gate revenue and TV contract money to really get people to spend more money on the market. ;)


Oh come on, don't try to act dumb.

My idea is based on the assumption that free agents take out much more money than cup revenue brings - I can't prove that, but as the economy is deflating ever since we saw those guys hit the market I think its a fair guess.

So, if we want to get rid of them AND not go back to the high inflation days, we should find a decent countermeasure, which could be cutting the cup bonusses. Its not that hard to understand, question is if my assumptions are somewhat accurate. If a GM or a BB (haha, joke) could enlighten us with some data that would be cool.

Größter Knecht aller Zeiten aka His Excellency aka President for Life aka Field Marshal Al Hadji aka Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Seas aka aka Conqueror of the Buzzerbeater Empire in Europe in General and Austria in Particular
This Post:
00
244598.19 in reply to 244598.18
Date: 6/22/2013 4:35:30 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
I was thinking about how to get rid of the free agents and came up with an idea to remove the bonus money for cup wins - on a global scale this would take out BILLIONS out of the economy, we could get rid of the free agents and maybe (?) raise the value of players on active teams.


That's a start, but I think we need to take away gate revenue and TV contract money to really get people to spend more money on the market. ;)


Oh come on, don't try to act dumb.

My idea is based on the assumption that free agents take out much more money than cup revenue brings - I can't prove that, but as the economy is deflating ever since we saw those guys hit the market I think its a fair guess.

So, if we want to get rid of them AND not go back to the high inflation days, we should find a decent countermeasure, which could be cutting the cup bonusses. Its not that hard to understand, question is if my assumptions are somewhat accurate. If a GM or a BB (haha, joke) could enlighten us with some data that would be cool.

Your questions are dumb
The market is in a deflation period,so even if you take out FA alone you don't go in an inflation mode
But taking out the cup bonuses,as I have explained to you in many previous posts,you would put the market in an even worse deflation,and that's not what the game need

If you want FA to disappera,propose it,and there will be a quiet discussion here.But the community will NEVER accept a swap of cup bonuses for FA elimination,put this thing in your head

Advertisement