BuzzerBeater Forums

Of course I would manage it differently i was just curious. I know what would happen if I dress someone else and didn't even assign him for either back up or reserve - simply the first unassined but dressed player would come into play (even before any back ups/ reserves from other position) - it happened me once already so I just wondered what would happen in above case but no big deal.

better tip, buy a player for 1k and fire him after the game ;) or better 3-4 of then.

Absolutely the best way to go.

However, enduring a voluntary walkovers gives you predictable minutes, since there is no foul trouble or blowout, no?

If I had to guess I'd say this will be addressed soon.

Why should be?

If there is non-realistic demand for exact amount of minutes, there should be a way to use SCs even with varying number of players caused by injuries. Otherwise an injury of players could influence training of others directly which imho shouldn't.

Purposely fielding an incomplete team should also be accompanied by a mass sell-off of season-ticket holders, a monumental drop in attendance, and an enthusiasm drop to 0.

This sucks because what is purposely?! Since injures are counted in 7-13 days weeks you can't really know if a certain player will be healthy soon enough to play. And you shouldn't be force to keep extra player (with bad game shape cause unused) just in case and lose money this way. Although it is obvious BB is trying to force to do this because of the new staff - increased injury rate thing.

And I really think these thing should be mentioned in rules opr at least there should be some summary including older changes in BB because otherwise it is a discrimination of later registered.

what?

Later registered players don't have access to relevant information others had. That simple.

they don't inform that there got more injuries, and till now that are just rumors ...

And even if you start later, you don't plan with the injurry prohability before the chanches cause you don't know then.

I don't understand the last sentence at all.

when you start after the "possible" change of injurie prohability, you don't know the old injurie prohability so that you don't have a leck of information cause you learning the new one from the start on.

I don't really understand your point. I meant when you are not setting the line up in the day of the match, it could be often beneficial to include a player with 1 week injury. Beacuse injuries are counted in 7-13 days per week. It is a gamble to some extent but it is worth it epecially if the injured player is good one. And it sometimes helps to have more reserves for a position because another injury to player at the same position could occur (for example if you have an injured pg which could be heatlhy day by day, you should dressed him for a match because another pg could be injured in the match, like this
three players which you usually rotate at PG, others are nto so suited. Called A,B and C.
A is injured. It is more than 7 days from his injury, so he could be healthy soon enough.
B will start.
C will back up him (or reserve)
A will be dressed as a reserve (or back up).
B is injured 5 minutes into game. If you were lucky not only C but also A is ready to step up. If not C has to play major minutes (with foul trouble, tireness from low stamina, even injury can happen and inferior player will come to place).

You can dress up recoverin player for a SC which make sense. Especially when your neede players already have enough minutes for game shape and training; but not all of them. It could be useful to dress only plaqyers you need to play and in that way if the injured one don't recover quickly enough and would be injured by the time of the match, a lucky fan comes into play. I strongly believe you shouldn't be punished by anything (fans included) for this. Especially if you still have at least five player on other positions.