BuzzerBeater Forums

Lets go back t the matter of my theory. I said 3-2 and 2-3 zone produce more/ and should produce shot blocks within the engine. 3-2 changes to 2-1-2 depending on sf skills and produce turn overs and more blks..

He cant say I don't have any inclinations on the matter.. he has give me a theory why im wrong beyond go look in the rules books. Because if we go that way it agrees with I just said up to matter of" 3-2 changing 2-1-2 on the sf skill to produce more blks and turnover in a defensive way:.. Which is my theory of how shot blocks will be working in zones

Thats what im calling him out on.. I have every right to call him out on it, to better my thinking methods on my theory to re- observe the matter. but thing is he has no theory to do such so he no right to come and say your wrong because it doesnt look or look feel right to him . if that is case then he does have theory and same theory he is using is the BB rule book . which agrees with what im saying up to matter of the "3-2 zone shifting to 3-2 collapse(2-1-2) depending on the sf skills.

Im on topic, I hope that clears up the matter.

I have a theory 3-2 zone turn 3-2 collasape 1-2-2 which is a form 3-2. where the sf swing behind the guard to trap them or the big to block and create turnovers. my eror of before callin 2-1-3 which a form of 2-3 zone

I have had games where of has a few block and a lot of steals.. the most of them coming in 3-2 zone

http://www.breakthroughbasketball.com/defense/3-2zone.html


click the link youll what im trying to say I have seen thins in games

2-1-3 which a form of 2-3 zone

I would hope you get more blocks with 6 players on the court.

http://www.breakthroughbasketball.com/defense/3-2zone.html
click the link youll what im trying to say I have seen thins in games

I clicked on the link but nothing happened.

I gave a example of the traps that leds to turn over as you can see the guard has to beat 3 defenders. The big man has to shot the jumper..

I was not saying the ge and real life 3-2 zone are one and the same, I was showing a example of the switch and where the block/ steals should occur. Just giving a general idea of 3-2 zone not saying it one and the same.

In the link.

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 5/11/2013 2:25:46 AM

This is exactly my point you give one example not even 100 PC proven and claim this proves your point. I dont know completely how BB zones work but I know that at anything above low levels they absolutely dont work as you claim. Thats all im saying


Last edited by DanielPaton at 5/11/2013 8:23:02 AM

A theory is not a definite. its thought of what could be.. Im not saying the Ge is 100 % accurate of 3-2 zone in the real world, But its base on that in way.

what im trying to show is how it might be performed so manager can get an idea of how sb and turnover could and should occur. In 3-2 zone not that its definite of the ge.


No matter of how they make 3-2 zone the sf will need great skill to stops the guard and the big man.. Thats my whole point. If defense breaks some one is in the paint regardless maybe 2 people so look inside could not work unless the game shape and skills of the team running 3-2 is bad..

This is why im saying if the sb is increased 3-2 should beat look inside just about every time, because the game is based on skills, and 3-2 is based on skills and experience

.

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 5/11/2013 9:18:32 PM

I'm cool with it. im not using all caps lol. My theory is its based on 3-2 zone real life in a fashion the way the pressure and defensive attitudes are of the matches almost compare only difference none one know how the defense men stands . If you watch defensive pressure of the Sf/sg they are getting a lot of steals and atleast 2 block or a block in 3-2 zone. the sf is getting at least 4-5 rebounds

Now this game automaticly put a double team on best player if his value is too high and rest to low( Li is the biggest culprit for this), only 2 people could be double team help in 3-2 zone down low the sg//sf.

If the defense breaks. the sf has to swing t0 middle real life or not because that's the only way the zone can perform to get a rebound, even if its 3 guys at the top and 2 guys at the bottom, , because if he was outside in zone he wouldn't get the rebound, its Impossible for him to do so.

They are about 18 -19 feet from the basket. no matter how the Ge slice it . the top 3 guys in 3-2 zone are guys are going to be 18-19ft from the basket unless the defense breaks to trap them, which means the sf/sg will have come to the inside to get a rebound or stop the weak side pass or to trap.

if it doesn't do that then every defense is basicly a over skilled man-man in the ge. if its based on stance and pressure then the stats should show what im trying to say in my theory

this just a theory of mines, not saying ge work like that 100% , but I have feeling it does in way of pressure and zone breakage..




http://www.coachesclipboard.net/images/32ZoneOffense.GIF


This vs look inside.. the pf or c would be trapped every possesion.

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 5/12/2013 5:47:01 AM