BuzzerBeater Forums

USA - II.2 > Season 15

Season 15

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Hokied

To: red
This Post:
00
168951.94 in reply to 168951.88
Date: 3/24/2011 9:47:43 PM
Deronimo
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
7171
well the indy hawks went bot

This Post:
00
168951.95 in reply to 168951.94
Date: 4/6/2011 6:58:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5252
Good game Albany, looking at the ratings I'm not sure I deserved to lose so badly, but you caught me with a 3-2 zone, and thats what I get for Road TIEing errr Playoff Normaling. Good luck to everyone who's left in playoffs/relegation!

From: dray

This Post:
00
168951.96 in reply to 168951.95
Date: 4/7/2011 12:45:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
55
Yep good game A&M. Was surprised you TIE.

Not sure I can expect anything different but at least I have Lucio Rodriguez back for next game. He was out for two weeks.

This Post:
00
168951.97 in reply to 168951.95
Date: 4/8/2011 3:32:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4545
You would win that game easily, if you didn't TIE, but I guess, you got a bit too overconfident. It's a shame, really, because you probably have the most talented team on Great 8. Oh well.

This Post:
22
168951.98 in reply to 168951.97
Date: 4/8/2011 8:41:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5252
Not sure I would win the game easily if I had CTed, considering I lost by 16. Wouldn't say I got overconfident, I knew my odds weren't great Normaling, but I knew that the only way I would have a chance to beat Deronimo 2 out of 3 was to TIE both the quarterfinal and the semifinal. Calculated risk.

This Post:
00
168951.99 in reply to 168951.98
Date: 4/9/2011 2:18:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4141
Wow, i chose a terrible time to forget to set my scrimmage lineup. Hooray for 9 form drops!

This Post:
00
168951.100 in reply to 168951.98
Date: 4/10/2011 3:49:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4545
Just my opinion. I have been wrong before. But in general, if you didn't think that you could take Albany with lesser enthusiasm, I don't think you would TIE, which brings me back to my point, you must have felt pretty strong about your chances. And if you didn't, then, I wouldn't call your move a "calculated risk" but rather something else.

Edit:
To clarify, I just think that it is better to play in Finals and lose, than to consciously play against your odds in Semi-finals and never reach Finals just on account that otherwise your chances to win the whole thing are at bare minimum.

Last edited by Mr. Hyde at 4/10/2011 4:12:38 AM

This Post:
00
168951.101 in reply to 168951.100
Date: 4/10/2011 5:08:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5252
That's how risks work, you take take a risk and you succeed, you look like a genius. However, you take a risk and you lose... well, we all know what Discipline thinks. From past experiences, risks have been working out for me.

Perhaps the regular season game against Albany was a fluke, but I tie'd on the road and still won. That kinda explains my reasoning behind my enthusiasm. Also, I don't think enthusiasm would have done it, my tactics and my inability to win key games to get home-court advantage is what made me lose.

Oh yea, nice win by Albany. It was really a horrible 4th quarter for Albany, but he hung in there. Finals should be fun to watch.

Last edited by czobo001 at 4/10/2011 5:12:02 AM

From: dray

This Post:
00
168951.102 in reply to 168951.101
Date: 4/10/2011 7:33:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
55
In that regular season game I had just sold two good players-my PG and a PF. My backup PF played most of the minutes.

And I have since bought a new, better PG, and my last lineup is my best.

This Post:
00
168951.104 in reply to 168951.101
Date: 4/10/2011 3:34:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4545
That's how risks work, you take take a risk and you succeed, you look like a genius. However, you take a risk and you lose... well, we all know what Discipline thinks.

Well, that was not my point at all. I believe that we were discussing your confidence level going into that game against Albany, not whether or not taking risks in general is something smart. Or stupid, if you wish.
But let's start from the beginning.
In my original post I comment that you got "a bit too overconfident." You responded how that is not true. Which is fair. The discussion should have probably end right there, but I made a beginners mistake and wrote another comment trying to explain why I thought that you were, and now we're discussing a completely new thing where you're emphasizing risk-taking opposed to my emphasis of your confidence.
If you're willing to read my previous post one more time, you'll see that my only point was that you must have felt strong about your chances, because if you didn't then you can't call it "calculated risk." Well, not the one with favorable outcome, that is. On that note, everyone can take a risk, and succeed from time to time, but only genius is genius.

Last edited by Mr. Hyde at 4/10/2011 3:36:07 PM

Advertisement