The 2nd guy really is only 'decent'. His Is makes it hard to convert him into an SF, so he's essentially a guard who trains a bit slower. I dont really think either one is worthy of being a long term SF option for you. I think their potential limits their ability to be that good. With hamar, you really have to decide whether or not you want him to put up points, put up good defense, or be meh but be meh everywhere. I think with his low 4 at RB and his IS at 7, I would lean towards offense. In fact, him getting into Is will directly aid Lupashko's growth (regardless of your views on him, he would need to improve on a 1.
The other reason i am not overly impressed with either is they both have a hole in stamina or FT. I don't know if Lupashko has foul issues, but usually 1 stamina makes it hard to get 48 in 1 game. 4 is good enough for Hamar, but he will not make more than a few FT's per season, and this can hurt performance while your developing players (hamar is less of an issue if you don't think you need to compete short term, Lupashko's stamina if it causes him to foul out is almost a death sentence until you fix it).
Edit: I'm not a pro talent guru or anything, this is just what i see.
Last edited by FuriousSK at 12/30/2012 6:02:59 PM