If i were to make these two into look inside bigs, i'd need a couple of things.
1) I'd need one of them to get to 10-11 JS so he could play PF for me. PF's still take a relatively high amount of jumpers on my team when i run LI.
2) I'd want to improve Kalcos' HA, direct training or indirect training, past the 1 rating it has. It's easier to train perimeter ratings early on in my opinion.
3) Because PF's take a significant amount of jumpers, I think you need to also pump up some OD to better defend against teams who have nice JS like you might have if you increase your JS as suggested.
4) I would most likely suggest to keep Is on the highest end of the rotation. In other words, Kalcos has a 9/7/7/8 right now with IS being on the high end at that 9. I would keep it slightly above the rest, and i wouldn't train SB anymore.
It'd be a bit of a painful out of position training session, and it changes dramatically if you are playing a different strategy. Base offense for example will require both the C and PF to have 10-11 JS, it will require every player on your team to have high secondaries for their positions.
As per the usual, i am no expert, this is merely what i would do if they were my trainees and i wanted to keep them for the long haul. I feel too many a GM don't make well rounded players, and they're too expensive for me on the market.
Last edited by FuriousSK at 12/31/2012 5:12:10 PM