Without wanting to look at the entire data and coming to my own conclusion, is the sample size big enough to make any estimations on the effects of the trainer level?
I've been working on this and age, and both are getting there, but are still pretty noisy. The age one should be good enough to release pretty soon, but trainer level is rough.
Specifically, we have a ton of data with level 4 and 5 trainers (there's 22 training type-skill combinations that train at a high enough rate and have enough data to compare the training rate between them), but level 6 is still very iffy. Levels 1-3 and 7 are basically non-existent (1-2 users with level 7, none with levels 1-3). So the only comparison I have any confidence in for now is the level 4 vs level 5 one. So all of you hoarding those level 6 and 7 trainers should join up
I assume you already know that (didn't read the whole thread), but just in case.
I recently changed my trainer level. I just saw this project and wanted to contribute. I submitted roughly 30 weeks of training results at once. Problem is, it seems to think my trainer has been the same for the entire duration. Only the last 5-6 weeks did training happen under my actual trainer.
PS: For people making the mistake of submitting with an unsupported language, I hope you find/found a way to automatically disregard those inputs. Hopefully one day you have it translated and that would be a big boost in the number of people submitting results.
Peace.
"Air is beautiful, yet you cannot see it. It's soft, yet you cannot touch it. Air is a little like my brain." - Jean-Claude Van Damme