BuzzerBeater Forums

A theory is not a definite. its thought of what could be.. Im not saying the Ge is 100 % accurate of 3-2 zone in the real world, But its base on that in way.

what im trying to show is how it might be performed so manager can get an idea of how sb and turnover could and should occur. In 3-2 zone not that its definite of the ge.


No matter of how they make 3-2 zone the sf will need great skill to stops the guard and the big man.. Thats my whole point. If defense breaks some one is in the paint regardless maybe 2 people so look inside could not work unless the game shape and skills of the team running 3-2 is bad..

This is why im saying if the sb is increased 3-2 should beat look inside just about every time, because the game is based on skills, and 3-2 is based on skills and experience

.

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 5/11/2013 9:18:32 PM

I'm cool with it. im not using all caps lol. My theory is its based on 3-2 zone real life in a fashion the way the pressure and defensive attitudes are of the matches almost compare only difference none one know how the defense men stands . If you watch defensive pressure of the Sf/sg they are getting a lot of steals and atleast 2 block or a block in 3-2 zone. the sf is getting at least 4-5 rebounds

Now this game automaticly put a double team on best player if his value is too high and rest to low( Li is the biggest culprit for this), only 2 people could be double team help in 3-2 zone down low the sg//sf.

If the defense breaks. the sf has to swing t0 middle real life or not because that's the only way the zone can perform to get a rebound, even if its 3 guys at the top and 2 guys at the bottom, , because if he was outside in zone he wouldn't get the rebound, its Impossible for him to do so.

They are about 18 -19 feet from the basket. no matter how the Ge slice it . the top 3 guys in 3-2 zone are guys are going to be 18-19ft from the basket unless the defense breaks to trap them, which means the sf/sg will have come to the inside to get a rebound or stop the weak side pass or to trap.

if it doesn't do that then every defense is basicly a over skilled man-man in the ge. if its based on stance and pressure then the stats should show what im trying to say in my theory

this just a theory of mines, not saying ge work like that 100% , but I have feeling it does in way of pressure and zone breakage..




http://www.coachesclipboard.net/images/32ZoneOffense.GIF


This vs look inside.. the pf or c would be trapped every possesion.

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 5/12/2013 5:47:01 AM

Yean in real life it works like that. If it does in here though is the question. We have very different type of players then what you see in real life, at least at high levels.

I was wondering about that. Is outside shooting more realistic at lower levels?

Sb will increased in zones and LI wont be working so well versus 3-2 zone because of the increase of block and pressure, two men cant do it alone ..


My last game is proof of that. Im surprised I won

Looking forward to it

ok The game has chemistry elements and also you can put a player on another player.. It has to have some kind of solo AI on players if they going by stats and allow personilized matchups with Gameshape , stats , mood , team chemistry.. if it not Ai then its Si( symmetric intelligence).

which mean the players do have a way to play within a role to the team and tactic set within their ability which is pre done before the match. and we see the results later in the match. SO im not really far off with my theory just in wrong area of thinking. player do have mood or the team does which I think give the a certain player a advantage over another player who might be in lesser mood or his team.

which might lead to better shot blocks for the player

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 5/13/2013 4:24:28 AM