BuzzerBeater Forums

I was really sold on Princeton for a while and liked what i read about peoples thoughts on it. So i tried it a few times With my best outside shooter out of my trainees at PF expecting to see him create a great miss match where he would score a lot of points. I also expected more inside shots by the guards and outside shots by specially my trainee. However my guards took mostly outside shots and my bigs took inside shots.Not the result i had expected at all.
I tried the other outside offenses though and i really came to like Outside Iso. It creates a miss match there and more shots are taken by him. Here's one of the games (52426949).

I do tend to see a lot more shots coming from the PG/SG/SF positions than the other two. My primary SG is taking a lot of threes also, but that's definitely a preferred behavior for the team as configured now. As far as the distribution, I am looking and it looks like my primary PG and SF guys take a lot of driving shots, while the SG has taken a lot more threes and very few inside / drives. Given their skill breakdown, though, that's probably what I'd expect - the SG is a shooter type while the other two aren't nearly as effective. Among the older big men, the one who has pretty decent JS takes more contested jumpers, while the one who is mediocre has taken a fair number of open ones, and the guy with pretty much no JS hasn't taken many at all.

I would like more HA on Dagneaux, but that would spike everyone else's DR. Apart from that and IS, they are unique builds. Staying ahead of the curve, I see.

If i were in youre place i would've get rid of Thijs Dagneaux already too high IS .This i one of mines ,unfortunetly he was born 19 and i bought him in week 8 from the start this was his starting skils : 7-7-4-7-6-6 2-7-7-7
he already got 2 IS pop without a single training in is or 1n1 now he look like this :


Weekly salary: $ 14 279
Role: key player
(BuzzerBeta)

DMI: 225200
Age: 22
Height: 6'10" / 208 cm
Potential: superstar
Game Shape: proficient

Jump Shot: proficient Jump Range: strong
Outside Def.: proficient Handling: prominent
Driving: proficient Passing: respectable
Inside Shot: inept Inside Def.: tremendous
Rebounding: prominent Shot Blocking: proficient
Stamina: inept Free Throw: respectable

Experience: pitiful

same goals as yours you can pm me about touhts of princeton and other stuff seem were trying to acomplish same goals :)

If i were in youre place i would've get rid of Thijs Dagneaux already too high IS .This i one of mines ,unfortunetly he was born 19 and i bought him in week 8 from the start this was his starting skils : 7-7-4-7-6-6 2-7-7-7
he already got 2 IS pop without a single training in is or 1n1 now he look like this :


Weekly salary: $ 14 279
Role: key player
(BuzzerBeta)

DMI: 225200
Age: 22
Height: 6'10" / 208 cm
Potential: superstar
Game Shape: proficient

Jump Shot: proficient Jump Range: strong
Outside Def.: proficient Handling: prominent
Driving: proficient Passing: respectable
Inside Shot: inept Inside Def.: tremendous
Rebounding: prominent Shot Blocking: proficient
Stamina: inept Free Throw: respectable

Experience: pitiful

Nice work there. Starting with the 4 OD would have been tough but then again, given the number of 6s and 7s I'm sure it could work. My guy Klein was drafted with a 7 in OD and ID but a whole lot of 1s in guard skills - I actually considered not training him at all but the potential and the fact he was an own draftee, plus the fact that he had the nice starting OD was a plus.

Did you have two additional trainees with him? The thing I'm concerned with now is that it is going to be hard to train all three of my guys properly in ID when that time comes. I figure hopefully I can pick up enough rebounding during short weeks like the ASG and offseason so that they won't be too terribly overmatched there, but playing 48 minutes against some of the players my team has to face is not encouraging.

i'm giving full training to 2 players and some training to mercenaries some oldies or ocasional bargained rookie for profit.This is my current Sf trainee to go along

Weekly salary: $ 11 874
Role: regular starter
(BuzzerBeta)

DMI: 46400
Age: 20
Height: 6'4" / 193 cm
Potential: MVP
Game Shape: respectable

Jump Shot: average ↑ Jump Range: average
Outside Def.: proficient Handling: inept
Driving: mediocre Passing: respectable
Inside Shot: proficient Inside Def.: sensational ↑
Rebounding: strong Shot Blocking: respectable
Stamina: pitiful ↓ Free Throw: mediocre

Experience: pitiful

i only single pos train ocasional when i messed up trainign switching to 2 position and no matter what players they be facing in the long run you'll be ahead,be it by larger merchandise ,sell profit or saved moneyh from transfer ,not to mention that youre having fun while doing so and invest in the future ,it's all good as long as you don't get relegated.

i only single pos train ocasional when i messed up trainign switching to 2 position and no matter what players they be facing in the long run you'll be ahead,be it by larger merchandise ,sell profit or saved moneyh from transfer ,not to mention that youre having fun while doing so and invest in the future ,it's all good as long as you don't get relegated.

I have three guys that are primary trainees plus a fourth that I am giving the minutes to as well when I am training a two position skill - I'm pretty much done with pressure now so I've been trying to get a lot of 1v1 training this season, and hopefully I can sneak in a couple more passing weeks at some point. Having the fourth guy drop out of the training rotation after this season is no problem, but the thought of sticking the guys in at C for 48 minutes is rough. But I still suppose it'll be easier to adjust to that than the struggles when they were playing PG.