BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Minor suggestion 2

Minor suggestion 2 (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
From: malice
This Post:
22
202503.987 in reply to 202503.385
Date: 8/2/2015 9:36:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
For smaller leagues: re-balance them eac off-season. Smaller leagues can become awfully lopsided, with one conference having several stronger teams, and the other only having one or two. Balancing this out would add to the competitive experience for these leagues.

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
This Post:
22
202503.988 in reply to 202503.987
Date: 8/5/2015 10:20:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1717
Very minor suggestion, but have the option to sort your players by Total Skill Points. I don't know if anyone has said this yet, but with total skill points being shown it would make it easier/faster to see how my players compare to each other in terms of total skill points. It's not really a necessity and it could be done manually pretty quick, but would make things easier/take less time.

This Post:
00
202503.989 in reply to 202503.988
Date: 8/8/2015 5:03:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
345345
Very minor suggestion, but have the option to sort your players by Total Skill Points. I don't know if anyone has said this yet, but with total skill points being shown it would make it easier/faster to see how my players compare to each other in terms of total skill points. It's not really a necessity and it could be done manually pretty quick, but would make things easier/take less time.



I was just about to write exactly this. We need it. Please! Help us sort them in our roster page according to TSP


EDIT: On transfer list level, when listing players, TSP is 0 for everyone. I think it's a bug

Last edited by Boston Celts at 8/8/2015 6:03:27 AM

This Post:
00
202503.991 in reply to 202503.990
Date: 8/13/2015 3:52:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
345345
I saw you guys added a nice little red tick for when you have a line-up set for a game. Which is a pretty cool feature. However, I have the tick when I have a default line-up set for the next game. Which basically means that for 90% of the managers who actually play this game, the tick is always there.


My suggestion is that the tick should only be there when you did not set the line-up manually. I should be aware of that. Like this, I never see any change...

Last edited by Boston Celts at 8/13/2015 3:52:46 PM

Message deleted
This Post:
11
202503.993 in reply to 202503.991
Date: 8/25/2015 9:07:36 AM
Vattjom Vatos
SBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
255255
Second Team:
Utopia Vatos
I saw you guys added a nice little red tick for when you have a line-up set for a game. Which is a pretty cool feature. However, I have the tick when I have a default line-up set for the next game. Which basically means that for 90% of the managers who actually play this game, the tick is always there.

My suggestion is that the tick should only be there when you did not set the line-up manually. I should be aware of that. Like this, I never see any change...


OR, perhaps a GREY tick if a default-lineup is set and a RED(or even better GREEN!) when a lineup is set.


This Post:
22
202503.994 in reply to 202503.993
Date: 8/25/2015 9:19:22 PM
TrenseRI
III.2
Overall Posts Rated:
36003600
Second Team:
ChiLeaders
Actually, there was a bug here and the tick was showing when it shouldn't have and vice versa. I think it should be OK now. In any case, we don't check for the default lineup at all. I'll consider the gray arrow suggestion though.

This Post:
11
202503.995 in reply to 202503.984
Date: 8/30/2015 6:28:31 AM
Neverwinter
CGBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
621621
That's a very low priority suggestion, but also not very hard to implement (I guess):

Supporters can assign numbers to their players, and they are shown in the roster page according to the order of the numbers. That can seem a cosmetic feature but it is a nice way to organize your roster in a logical and practical way.

However, when you are selecting your players before a match, they are shown in alphabetical order, which adds some chaos to the process. So my suggestion is: players should be organized according to their numbers in the "select players" page, not alphabetically.

Currently it is like this:

12 - John Adams
3 - Lebron Carter
82 - Carmelo East
Gilbert Jones
5- Hector Matthews
41- John Newton


Should be like this:

3 - Lebron Carter
5- Hector Matthews
12 - John Adams
41- John Newton
82 - Carmelo East
Gilbert Jones


Good idea, I would also add default ordering by position, instead alphabetically.

This Post:
00
202503.996 in reply to 202503.995
Date: 9/1/2015 1:45:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
My semi-permanent annoyance with PP100 continues. Lowest position PP100 on the team is 62.0, but the team can't even score at a 50 PP100 clip. Highest PP100 on the team is 88.9, ends up with 7 points on 16 shots (well, 17 shots if you include the backup's 0-1). And of course, my opponent's PP100 was also quite under what was deserved, but Princeton always seemed to do that for me too. (87352964)

(Edit to add the actual suggestion: either modify the calculation of PP100 so it is slightly more accurate or please reduce the incidence of sub-15% shooting nights for guys with PP100 above 60 and double digit shots).

Last edited by GM-hrudey at 9/1/2015 1:47:18 PM

Advertisement