BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Minor suggestion 2

Minor suggestion 2 (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
202503.991 in reply to 202503.990
Date: 8/13/2015 3:52:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
345345
I saw you guys added a nice little red tick for when you have a line-up set for a game. Which is a pretty cool feature. However, I have the tick when I have a default line-up set for the next game. Which basically means that for 90% of the managers who actually play this game, the tick is always there.


My suggestion is that the tick should only be there when you did not set the line-up manually. I should be aware of that. Like this, I never see any change...

Last edited by Boston Celts at 8/13/2015 3:52:46 PM

Message deleted
This Post:
11
202503.993 in reply to 202503.991
Date: 8/25/2015 9:07:36 AM
Vattjom Vatos
SBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
255255
Second Team:
Utopia Vatos
I saw you guys added a nice little red tick for when you have a line-up set for a game. Which is a pretty cool feature. However, I have the tick when I have a default line-up set for the next game. Which basically means that for 90% of the managers who actually play this game, the tick is always there.

My suggestion is that the tick should only be there when you did not set the line-up manually. I should be aware of that. Like this, I never see any change...


OR, perhaps a GREY tick if a default-lineup is set and a RED(or even better GREEN!) when a lineup is set.


This Post:
22
202503.994 in reply to 202503.993
Date: 8/25/2015 9:19:22 PM
TrenseRI
III.2
Overall Posts Rated:
36003600
Second Team:
ChiLeaders
Actually, there was a bug here and the tick was showing when it shouldn't have and vice versa. I think it should be OK now. In any case, we don't check for the default lineup at all. I'll consider the gray arrow suggestion though.

This Post:
11
202503.995 in reply to 202503.984
Date: 8/30/2015 6:28:31 AM
Neverwinter
CGBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
621621
That's a very low priority suggestion, but also not very hard to implement (I guess):

Supporters can assign numbers to their players, and they are shown in the roster page according to the order of the numbers. That can seem a cosmetic feature but it is a nice way to organize your roster in a logical and practical way.

However, when you are selecting your players before a match, they are shown in alphabetical order, which adds some chaos to the process. So my suggestion is: players should be organized according to their numbers in the "select players" page, not alphabetically.

Currently it is like this:

12 - John Adams
3 - Lebron Carter
82 - Carmelo East
Gilbert Jones
5- Hector Matthews
41- John Newton


Should be like this:

3 - Lebron Carter
5- Hector Matthews
12 - John Adams
41- John Newton
82 - Carmelo East
Gilbert Jones


Good idea, I would also add default ordering by position, instead alphabetically.

This Post:
00
202503.996 in reply to 202503.995
Date: 9/1/2015 1:45:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
My semi-permanent annoyance with PP100 continues. Lowest position PP100 on the team is 62.0, but the team can't even score at a 50 PP100 clip. Highest PP100 on the team is 88.9, ends up with 7 points on 16 shots (well, 17 shots if you include the backup's 0-1). And of course, my opponent's PP100 was also quite under what was deserved, but Princeton always seemed to do that for me too. (87352964)

(Edit to add the actual suggestion: either modify the calculation of PP100 so it is slightly more accurate or please reduce the incidence of sub-15% shooting nights for guys with PP100 above 60 and double digit shots).

Last edited by GM-hrudey at 9/1/2015 1:47:18 PM

This Post:
22
202503.998 in reply to 202503.997
Date: 9/13/2015 1:44:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
883883
I don't know if this has been suggested already (probably has) but a toggle button for a U21/NT warning for "Do you really want to add 'Player X' to the team?"

I hate misclicks and need the warnings. Call me old and net unsavvy.