BuzzerBeater Forums

Khm... You fail no blocks !!!

Well, that's a great all-around performance!

It takes a pretty good all around game to get one of those. A quintuple double would be even more impressive though.

Marjan Pekovic in those 2 games, but unfortunatly he doesn't have good SB :'(

(4311956)
(8477072)

^_^

I am more interested in good triple doubles. These are weak performances imo:) Against a team in lower division playing FCP and 48 mins. I have a reserve that almost got 3 in all just missed one steal in 36 mins and no fcp... Almost means almost! Good performances are the ones that come when you play against your rival or some other great team. Example I played against a best team on the other side of the league table. Had 40 point performance from SF that I looked a replacement for from the TL. He will prolly retire being a member of my team for that heroic performance!

I know everyone thinks they have something special on their team but use some common sense to filter out useless games stats...

Totally disagree with Kukoc. A good perefromance is in the eye of the beholder.

There used to be a college player named Alfredick "The Great" Hughes. He played for Loyalo University of Chicago. I believe he led the nation in scoring his senior season. Anyway one game he went 1 for 20, with his one made bucket being a last second 30 footer that won the game. When asked after the game how he felt about missing his first 19 shots, The Great replied, "I stuck that last one and we won the game." Now many people would see his game as horrible. I'll bet his teammates were damn glad he busted that last one, though.

My best performance- (2167571) Supanut Kaewjaroen. Well, that and his 58 point outburst on June 17th.

George Hill greatest FO draft blunder of All Time.

No. That honor would go to Alfredrick "The Great" Hughes, Oliver Robinson or Chris Carawell.
--------
Never heard of him:D

I presume that they should have won that game with 15+ points easy if he would have shown up. Yes good scorers tend to keep shooting even when they have an off day. 1-20 shooting is extreamly horrible performance nomatter how you look at it. I don't know what his other stats were in that game but I would not let that guy take the last shot if he had gone 0-19 before that one. Yes there are guys who play crunch time better and are known of their big shots. If you have ever played basketball in your life there is nothing like "Sticking to the last shot" my god basketball player are known of their silly comments all around the world. We lost because we did not have enough poise or the other team wanted it more or we were not aggressive enough etc. That's just bull. If you go play basketball you go for the win nomatter what and you want to make every shot you take play defence as well as you can etc. Nobody thinks I'm going to miss my first 19 shots and will make my 20-th I hope we are still in the game until that happens:D If you take it by point or any other stat then the team would have not won if guynr1 did not make that one rebound in that game, guynr2 scored that one point from FT, it's sad that he got remembered by a lousy game winner as the team won that game and he almost lost it for em.
Ahh I must have too much time in my hands:D

is that a laughing reply to me? :D

all right you made it, i'm laughing!

anyway both of that match were very close, especially the second one, and Pekovic is one of the best SF in the world.

good BB ^_^

In todays game, my PF had this stat line:

PF A. Burcík 38 2 - 16 1 - 3 6 - 8 4 17 3 2 2 2 3 11 11.5

I know he is one steal and 1 block away from your requirement and his shooting today was awful, but he did achieve something different: Got injured in the 3rd quarter and was fixed up by the doctor during the break :).

(10316126)

This is from a Spanish friendly.. look at the PG : )

65 points, 12 rebounds, 10 assists and 11 steals..

Only a 11,0? He has 13,0 for less than that!!!

I think that he just played alone..

The point is, Kukoc, exactly the opposite of what you think. In the game of basketball, stats are not what win games. Anyone who has ever played the game knows that real basketball is a team game where talent, determination, and luck combine to create a winner and a loser,which is the only important stat in a competitive game. A player can have no points and be the most important player on the floor, or a player can score 58 and be useless.

So 1-20 is statistically miserable. But The Great's 1-20 gave his team a W, which if you have ever played the game you know is what matters. Every shot taken in a basketball game is an individual event, not the culmination of all events before, which is why statistics are trivial during a game. Which is why good shooters keep shooting. At least the ones who recognize that just because you miss 1 or 10 or 19 in a row doesn't mean you're not going to make the next one, and if you are the best player on the floor you should want the ball in the most important situation.

I don't know where you got your stat about AH being one of the worst FO picks (does FO stand for First Round?) but he isn't even in the top 50.

Also, and far more importantly, what does the level of competition have to do with good or bad performance? An elementary school kid can't have a good game?

Not being aggressive is a totally valid reason for losing a game. So is not having enough poise. Just ask Chris Webber. Explain why those reasons are just bull.

It is a mistake to explain wins and losses by stats in real basketball. Stats are the effect, not the cause.