I read all the thread now and i hope its not too late : )
First of all, no users posting here from the biggest community in BB, Spain, a very few Italians, no much people from Germany and France also. And what about South America Countries? Nearly no one here!
In the other side a lot of messages from people in very small countries giving an opinion that i absolute disagree, specially about the economy changes and the 10%-20% increases in the wages (coming in 2 seasons). There is also here a debate with the wages and the impact in B3.
Some info:
Spain has 5433 users
Italy has 3920 users
Polska has 2798 users
Usa has 2167 users
France has 1449 users
Lietuva, Latvija and Eesti are over 5000 if we count the 3 as 1.
Argentina and Germany and Portugal also are over 1000.
If teams from countries with 25 users or 100 or even 400 are fighting for winning the B3 all those years, something is not working here. Its clear that Less competitive leagues give huge advantages to fight for the B3. Only a team from a great league, Springfield Drunkers, has won once the B3, in his first year, and made 2 finals, but he has been forced to play the promotion Play Offs to stand in Serie A last season, and in season 5 he didnt make the POs.
He has never won the Italian Serie A the years he played the B3.
Teams from Sweden, Nederlands, Osterreich, Norway and Canada are making 1/4 finals easily (in most of the cases winning easyly their own leagues), and very strong teams from Spain (for example) most of the times lost in Round1/Round2. Only Granada Stars arrived once to the 1/4 finals, and if we except Italy and sometimes USA, its hard to see teams from the most populated countries in the final rounds of the B3.
Even if we accept some exceptions, the best managers are in the most populated countries (more teams, more quality), but we are not seeing this in the B3. Small countries teams can TIE all the league/cup games during the B3, win them and (till last year) they were able to put their best players in the B3 as it was very easy for them to take in control the minutes of his players.
Also they have more economy incomes (better results), better stadiums (no rivalry, no needs to spend in players, they can use a season to spend 40k in wages and invert the rest in stadium and they are going to play in a top division anyway)
And now they want exceptions for the 10-20% players national tax? More advantages? If they are few managers, they have less players to buy, but also there is no rivalry to buy them.
My opinion is that teams from little countries should play between them before the B3 starts and then the best of them go to the B3. Or maybe 2 or 4, but never all the teams, it is suppossed to be a super competition between the best managers of the world.
And thats not just my opinion, i spoke about that with some of the top teams of Spain and agree.
Its uncomparable to win the league of a top country with 4000-5000 users (as the Spanish/italian champion do) with playing nearly alone in phantom leagues.
I want to see replys and answers from people in populated countries. What do they think?
Regards form Spain.
Last edited by LeYeNdiNhA at 3/18/2009 1:39:05 PM