BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Mobile App > BB present and future

BB present and future

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
308997.3 in reply to 308997.2
Date: 4/3/2021 5:21:46 PM
Franca Shoemakers Revival
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
561561
Second Team:
Mito só o da Caverna



Like I said before: more games each week means less preparation of each game and this means a more predictable rival and that means boredom.


The timing of BB is alright, I agree. The fine tuning would be to improve All-Star Week to grant 3 matches to everyone (it's a dull week for most users) and grant more matches during the off-season as well (I wonder how many new users left because they got a new team during the offseason and they got bored from scratch because nothing was going on)


Last edited by Bernspin at 4/3/2021 5:22:22 PM

From: ned

This Post:
1515
308997.4 in reply to 308997.1
Date: 4/3/2021 5:47:57 PM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
- More matches per week


Absolutely against this option

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
From: goranj
This Post:
22
308997.5 in reply to 308997.4
Date: 4/9/2021 5:16:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
166166
Hello Guys,

In my opinion:

1) Playoff should be Best of 3, where in Finals Best of 5.
2) Income during playoffs should be entirely given to the host, that is why I suggest best of 3 and 5 mode. I am fighting all season to have 1st seed and then split my income.. WTF?
3) Draft should not be obligatory, you could make your U18 academy to bring even younger players like 16, 17 with lower SS. I am not sure about rules but European style is preferrable instead of US draft. Please notice that most of the users in this game are from Europe.
4) Maybe more investment in such things as: fan club, club bus etc to build enthusiasm during home/away games.
5) I would deliver more skills so the players can be more versatile. Maybe SS12 at least.
6) I think that each league could have it's own Cup, best of 1. Minutes from these games could be added to the training. This could be fun - just 4 games maximum, one per week. Maybe small prize like investing some points in the draft or 100.000 USD for the winner, 50.000 USD for second finalist.

King Crimson
From: Naeem

This Post:
11
308997.6 in reply to 308997.5
Date: 4/9/2021 10:59:08 AM
Detroit Mercy Mavericks
IV.11
Overall Posts Rated:
9494
Second Team:
GoFarsr Revolutions
For 1, I think the current Playoff format is fine. For 2, I do however agree with the playoff income aspect you mentioned.

For 3, The draft should remain obligatory BUT you should also be able to have an optional U18 academy. Ill post a link that has my detailed idea on that. The longest comment will be the one i am referring to of course.

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/forum/read.aspx?thr...)

The link above is about the inclusion of an optional youth team and its importance. The link below is about the increase of content per week including the youth team giving an example of what it could look like. With both links, focus on my post in them to see what i am talking about.

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/forum/read.aspx?thr...)

I agree with 4, do not quite understand what you mean by 5, and I like 6 a lot actually. Maybe 6 could be a midseason in league cup.


Last edited by Naeem at 4/9/2021 11:05:36 AM

From: goranj

This Post:
22
308997.7 in reply to 308997.6
Date: 4/10/2021 8:08:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
166166
By 5 I mean that players should have more primary skills. Like there was a player Bruce Bowen - his ID, OD, BS, PS would be high, what about rest? I am not sure, more main skills, more versatile players.

point 7 - players should be available for release after minimum 1 week since buying them. now this is happening that teams are just buying players to play them in cup game let's say and then they fire them.

King Crimson
From: js8

This Post:
11
308997.8 in reply to 308997.7
Date: 4/10/2021 2:17:20 PM
Optic Fibres
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
557557
Second Team:
Wānaka Lakers
point 7 - players should be available for release after minimum 1 week since buying them. now this is happening that teams are just buying players to play them in cup game let's say and then they fire them.

I think this is a great idea and this issue definitely needs addressing.

This Post:
00
308997.9 in reply to 308997.8
Date: 4/10/2021 2:39:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
305305
In NBA there are 3 day contracts

This Post:
00
308997.10 in reply to 308997.9
Date: 4/10/2021 2:50:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
166166
Right and you pay these players. Here you don’t.

King Crimson
This Post:
11
308997.12 in reply to 308997.11
Date: 4/10/2021 4:36:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
166166
I meant that even you contract someone for 3 days, you still need to pay him. Here you sign & release. Where is salary or
like you mentioned - severance? That would be cool. You release a real ballast and be honest - Only capable and rich clubs buy players like that. There should be some compensation for released players and on the other hand it shouldn’t be so easy to strengthen your team just for one or 2 games without paying salary, just signing cost.

Point 8 - maybe there should be something like contract extension fee. I don’t think that players should be released free when you don’t extend, but maybe put on TL. Richest club are getting richer. We must stop that. Especially in weak countries without enough users.

Last edited by goranj at 4/10/2021 4:38:11 PM

King Crimson
This Post:
00
308997.13 in reply to 308997.12
Date: 4/10/2021 4:42:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
305305
but who are complaining for those things?

They say, don't fix what ain't broken

Advertisement